Recovering Damages From a Drugged Driver Wreck in Catoosa, OK
Drugs are involved in more fatal crashes than alcohol in many recent studies. Drug-impaired driving claims face challenges DUI cases don’t. Defense strategies leverage these complications. A Catoosa drugged driving accident lawyer knows how to overcome the proof challenges.
Drugged Driving Isn’t Just Illegal Drugs
The widespread misunderstanding is that drugged driving requires drugs of abuse. It doesn’t.
Prescription Medications
Many prescription medications impair driving. Common impairing prescriptions include:
- Prescription opioids
- Anti-anxiety medications
- Prescription sleep aids
- Skeletal muscle relaxers
- Mental health prescriptions
- Allergy medications
- Prescription stimulants
- Migraine medications
- Anti-seizure medications
Over-the-Counter Medications
Many over-the-counter medications can impair driving:
- Sedating cold and allergy medications
- Cough suppressants
- OTC sleep medications
- Motion sickness medications
Recreational Drugs
Illicit substances include marijuana products, stimulant drugs, amphetamines, illegal opioids, psychedelics, synthetic drugs (synthetic cannabinoids, bath salts), dissociative drugs, and huffing-type drugs.
Why Drugged Driving Cases Are Harder to Prove Than DUI Cases
No Equivalent of the .08 BAC Standard
The 0.08 BAC standard is universally established. There’s no analogous “limit” for most drugs. Some jurisdictions have THC per se limits, but those limits don’t necessarily correlate with actual impairment.
For nearly all drugs other than marijuana in some states, impairment must be demonstrated.
Detection Difficulties
Blood and urine tests can detect drug presence, but presence isn’t impairment.
THC metabolites persist long after impairment subsides. This makes it scientifically problematic to argue that detected THC proves impairment at the time of the crash.
Detection times vary significantly. Some are detectable only briefly, others persist for days.
Testing Isn’t Routine
Police officers routinely test for alcohol after crashes. Drug screening doesn’t happen automatically in many cases. If law enforcement didn’t test for drugs, impairment must be established through other means.
Drug Recognition Experts (DREs)
DREs conduct specialized assessments. These assessments support drug impairment findings when conducted. DRE availability varies.
Defense Challenges
Defense routinely attacks drug impairment evidence:
- “Presence isn’t impairment”
- “The test was conducted improperly”
- Prescription drug defenses
- “There’s no proof of impairment at the actual time of driving”
How These Cases Get Built
Toxicology Evidence
Where testing was conducted, results provide direct evidence of drug presence.
However, toxicology must be interpreted carefully. Expert toxicologists help connect the test results to actual impairment.
Observable Impairment
Officer observations provide critical evidence of actual impairment.
Common signs include:
- Verbal impairment
- Glassy or bloodshot eyes
- Coordination problems
- Unusual presentations
- Sedation signs
- Witnessed driving problems
- SFST failures
- Body signs of intoxication
Pre-Crash Driving Behavior
Pre-crash driving descriptions support impairment claims. Specific pre-crash driving patterns build the impairment case.
Criminal Charges
Drug-impaired driving charges, DUI-drugs charges, or DWI charges provide powerful evidence. Criminal convictions for drug-impaired driving may create issue preclusion.
Driver Statements and Admissions
Statements to police provide direct proof.
Medical Records
Medical history can show relevant drug history.
Vehicle Evidence
Items in the driver’s possession provide direct evidence of drug use.
Punitive Damages and Drugged Driving
These cases often involve egregious conduct supporting punitive damages. Choosing to drive while drug-impaired frequently meets the punitive standard.
Punitive damages can substantially increase recovery in serious drugged driving cases.
Common Insurance Defenses
“There’s No Proof of Impairment”
The most common challenge. Presence-without-impairment defense.
“The Medication Was Taken as Prescribed”
Where prescription drugs were involved, “Doctor-prescribed and taken correctly”. Prescription compliance doesn’t necessarily negate impairment. Legal prescription use can still cause impairment.
“Comparative Fault”
Defense pushes shared-fault arguments.
“The Crash Wasn’t Caused by Drug Impairment”
Causation defenses. Expert analysis counters these defenses.
Critical Steps After a Drugged Driving Crash
Get the Police Report
Insist on official documentation. Pay attention to documentation of drug testing.
Document Witness Observations
Witnesses who observed the other driver’s behavior can establish impairment when toxicology is unavailable.
Preserve the Vehicle Evidence
Drug paraphernalia, prescription bottles, or related materials can build the impairment case.
Document Driver Statements
Anything the other driver said at the scene.
Photograph the Scene
Visual evidence of the crash scene.
Get Medical Attention Immediately
Quick medical attention anchors the claim.
Track the Criminal Case
The criminal proceedings may establish key facts.
Don’t Wait to Get Legal Help
Toxicology and other evidence has time-sensitive preservation requirements.
Damages Available
These claims can pursue the typical categories plus enhanced damages:
- Comprehensive medical care
- Lost wages
- Reduced ability to work
- Vehicle repair or replacement
- Non-economic damages
- Wrongful death and survivor damages
- Punitive damages — frequently significant in these cases
Dram Shop and Third-Party Liability
In specific prescription drug situations, additional defendants may exist. Healthcare providers who prescribed medications without adequate warnings about driving may create medical malpractice issues.
Attorney Costs
Counsel handling these cases charge no upfront fees. Case reviews cost nothing. Expert witness costs can be significant advanced by the firm.
Move Quickly
Drug evidence has time-sensitive preservation issues. Scene evidence is lost. The legal time limit sets a hard cutoff. Getting an attorney involved promptly positions the claim for the full recovery these cases can produce.