“Labor Omnia Vincit” McKay Law
Negligent security cases are particularly challenging and sensitive in Guthrie, OK. When businesses or landlords ignore foreseeable dangers and crime victims pay the price, the legal path to justice involves proving what should have been prevented. McKay Law represents negligent security victims throughout OK. Negligent security cases present unique challenges—showing the owner knew or should have known about the risk and failed to act. These crimes typically occur at residential properties, commercial businesses, hospitality venues, and public gathering places. These cases can involve criminal acts that reasonable security measures would have prevented or deterred. Establishing the property owner’s responsibility takes specialized expertise—often involving review of prior crime history, security policies, and industry standards. Our Guthrie inadequate security lawyers move fast to preserve evidence—the proof needed to establish what the owner knew and what they failed to do. Complex premises claims demand expert analysis to demonstrate how proper measures would have prevented the attack. Potential defendants include every party whose decisions or inaction contributed to the dangerous conditions. Insurance complications are common—making thorough investigation of all available insurance critical. Victims often suffer gunshot wounds, traumatic brain injuries from beatings, sexual assault trauma, stab wounds, broken bones, severe psychological injuries including PTSD, and wrongful death. We fight for every dollar including hospital costs, ongoing therapy, missed income, suffering, and survivor damages. The other side will argue the attack was unforeseeable—you need legal counsel experienced with premises liability litigation. Every negligent security case is handled on a contingency basis—you pay nothing unless we win. Contact McKay Law today for a no-cost case review with a Guthrie, OK inadequate security attorney who will hold every negligent property owner and entity accountable.
Property owners have a legal duty to protect visitors from foreseeable criminal acts. When security failures lead to crime victimization, the property owner can be held liable. This is called negligent security. These cases often involve apartments, hotels, retail, and other commercial properties where inadequate lighting, broken locks, insufficient cameras, lack of security personnel, or known crime risks lead to violence. McKay Law advocates for negligent security victims in Guthrie and in surrounding communities.
Whether security is “adequate” depends on the circumstances:
To win a negligent security case, foreseeability must be established. Foreseeability is proven by:
Sexual assault cases involve unique considerations:
You typically have 2 years from the date of the incident to file (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). Sexual assault cases may have extended deadlines under certain circumstances. For children, the deadline may be tolled until age 18.
We get to work immediately to secure surveillance video before it’s deleted, examine crime data, secure history of incidents, retain security experts, coordinate civil and criminal cases, protect client privacy in sensitive cases, partner with treating providers, and prepare every case as if it will go to trial.
A: Likely yes if you can establish foreseeability and security failures.
A: Nothing upfront. No fee unless we recover.
A: Yes, if the attack was foreseeable and security was inadequate.
A: Hotels can be liable for sexual assault. Multiple security failures often create liability.
A: Reasonably predictable. Foreseeability is typically established through prior incidents, neighborhood crime, or specific threats.
A: Wrongful death cases are available for negligent security deaths.
A: Don’t. Refer them to your attorney.
A: Yes — when possible. Document anything you can.
A: Two years from the date of the incident (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). For minors, the deadline may be tolled until age 18.
These cases combine premises liability with criminal conduct by third parties. The criminal who actually attacked you isn’t the defendant. The property owner who created the conditions allowing the attack is the defendant. This legal framework is distinct from standard premises liability. A local attorney experienced with these claims builds these cases around the actual legal framework.
The core question in negligent security is whether property owners can be liable for criminal acts committed by third parties.
The general principle is no liability.
Multiple exceptions apply.
The central legal concept in negligent security.
Property owners can be liable for criminal acts by third parties when foreseeable criminal conduct.
Foreseeability is shown through prior similar criminal activity.
Special relationships impose stronger duties for security:
Prior crime on the property is the most powerful foreseeability evidence.
Prior crime evidence should include:
Neighborhood crime data can establish foreseeability when the property is in a high-crime area.
Sources for area crime data include:
Owner knowledge of crime risk can establish foreseeability:
Risk-elevated property types:
Theft and robbery cases.
Physical assault in parking lots, garages, building common areas.
Sexual victimization.
These cases produce particularly significant damages.
Gun violence incidents create distinct case scenarios.
Mass shooting events can support negligent security claims.
Apartment-related crime is a major negligent security category.
Hotel-related violence and theft can support negligent security claims.
Parking facility crime drives many cases.
Employer-related workplace violence.
Adequate security depends on the property and the specific risk profile.
Security components include:
Adequate exterior and interior lighting.
Insufficient lighting is a frequent contributing cause.
Operational camera coverage.
Adequate cameras require:
Security guards or personnel, particularly for properties with elevated risk profiles.
Controls on access to the property.
Working locks.
Communication infrastructure, including cellular signal in parking garages.
Proper landscaping.
Security procedures, Training programs, Crisis protocols.
Poor lighting creates concealment opportunities facilitates crime.
Non-functional cameras don’t deter crime.
Insufficient security staff considering risk.
Implementation failures carry greater exposure.
Broken access controls.
Security personnel inadequately trained.
Disregarded complaints are exposed to enhanced damages.
Compensation in these cases include:
Emergency and trauma care, Surgery expenses, Inpatient care, rehabilitation, Long-term medical needs, Mental health damages.
Lost wages and reduced earning ability.
Physical pain and suffering.
PTSD is common after negligent security incidents drive significant damages.
Effects on daily life and activities.
Spousal damages.
In fatal negligent security cases.
Exemplary damages are particularly common, especially where:
The property owner is the primary defendant.
Management firms may share fault.
Security service providers can face direct liability for service deficiencies.
Multiple property-related parties can share liability.
Franchisor liability, franchisors may face liability in some circumstances.
Defense’s main argument.
Defense argues the criminal act was unforeseeable. Comprehensive prior-crime evidence defeats this defense.
Defense argues the security provided was reasonable.
Defense argues no causal connection between security failures and the criminal act.
Comparative fault arguments.
“The attacker did this, not us”. This argument generally fails because liability can rest on the property owner regardless of the criminal’s responsibility.
Make sure police are called. Official reports matter.
Same-day medical care is essential.
Comprehensive property documentation.
Specific security failures observed before, during, or after the incident.
Visual evidence of every relevant detail.
Other people at the property.
Crime history require investigation.
Psychological treatment often require significant treatment.
Property owner insurers contact quickly. Recorded statements before legal advice can permanently damage the case.
Lawyers experienced with negligent security charge no upfront fees. Specialty expertise costs paid by counsel.
Negligent security cases involve time-sensitive evidence.
Video recordings has limited retention.
Personnel changes making them harder to locate.
Owners typically upgrade security, which can be used as evidence of inadequacy.
Filing deadlines sets a hard cutoff.
Engaging counsel right away positions the case for the substantial recovery these cases can produce when properly built.
When a assault happens in a parking lot, hotel hallway, apartment complex, or store, the criminal is rarely the only one responsible. Property owners have a legal obligation to put in place reasonable security for everyone they invite onto their premises — and when they skip that duty, foreseeable crimes happen and innocent people get hurt. Negligent security claims emerge when a property had a track record of prior crimes that should have prompted action, when known hazards like broken locks, dead security cameras, burned-out parking lot lights, missing security personnel, and unsecured access points were never fixed, and when reasonable measures — proper lighting, working surveillance, trained guards, access controls — would have stopped the attack. At McKay Law, we tackle these cases by investigating the property’s crime history, prior complaints to management, security audits, police call records, and the owner’s response — or non-response — to known risks. We consult security experts, crime prevention specialists, and former law enforcement to establish exactly what a reasonable owner would have done and why this owner fell short.
Apartment complexes, hotels, parking garages, shopping centers, bars and nightclubs, ATMs, gas stations, college campuses, and event venues all carry major legal responsibility for the safety of the people they invite onto their property. When you become part of the McKay Law family, we fight for compensation that reflects the full scope of what was taken from you — physical and emotional. We demand the highest possible compensation for emergency care, surgeries, hospitalization, ongoing rehabilitation, future medical needs, prescription costs, counseling and psychiatric care for trauma and PTSD, lost income, diminished earning ability, the profound fear, anxiety, and emotional aftermath of being assaulted in a place that was supposed to be safe — and in the most tragic cases, the wrongful death of a loved one. Contact us right away at (866) 679-9651 or contact us online to arrange your free, confidential consultation and place a firm that treats crimes against innocent victims with the gravity they deserve on your side.
See why so many others choose McKay Law, PLLC
With over 300 five-star reviews, McKay Law, your local Personal Injury Law Firm has earned the trust and gratitude of our clients. Every case we handle is unique, and every client’s story matters. Don’t just take our word for it—hear directly from our clients about their experiences and why they confidently recommend us to others.
