“Labor Omnia Vincit” McKay Law
Inadequate security claims are uniquely demanding from both legal and human perspectives in Owasso, OK. When businesses or landlords ignore foreseeable dangers and crime victims pay the price, holding the property owner accountable becomes critical. McKay Law advocates for negligent security victims throughout OK. Inadequate security claims involve complexities beyond ordinary slip-and-fall matters—proving foreseeability, establishing the property owner’s duty, and connecting security failures to the criminal act. Inadequate security claims frequently arise from residential properties, commercial businesses, hospitality venues, and public gathering places. These cases can involve violent attacks, sexual assaults, robberies, and homicides on unsecured properties. Determining liability demands experienced legal work—under premises liability and negligence principles. Our Owasso negligent security attorneys move fast to preserve evidence—police reports of prior crimes on or near the property, surveillance footage, security personnel records, maintenance logs for locks and lighting, witness statements, and property management communications. Complex premises claims demand expert analysis to demonstrate how proper measures would have prevented the attack. We pursue claims against property owners, property management companies, security companies hired to protect the premises, business operators and tenants, hotel and motel franchises, and parent corporations that set security policies. Negligent security cases raise complex insurance questions—with coverage disputes over intentional acts exclusions and additional insured issues. Injuries from negligent security incidents gunshot wounds, traumatic brain injuries from beatings, sexual assault trauma, stab wounds, broken bones, severe psychological injuries including PTSD, and wrongful death. We recover all available damages including hospital costs, ongoing therapy, missed income, suffering, and survivor damages. Property owners and their insurers will fight hard against these claims—you need legal counsel experienced with premises liability litigation. All inadequate security claims is handled on a contingency fee basis—no fees unless we recover. Contact McKay Law today for a free consultation with a Owasso, OK inadequate security attorney who will identify all sources of compensation.
Property owners have a legal duty to protect visitors from foreseeable criminal acts. When inadequate security leads to assaults, robberies, or other criminal acts that injure visitors, legal liability can follow. This is called negligent security. Negligent security cases involve apartment complexes, hotels, parking lots, shopping centers, bars, nightclubs, and other locations where poor security led to crime. McKay Law represents negligent security victims in Owasso and in surrounding communities.
Adequate security depends on the situation:
For these cases to succeed, you must establish that the crime was foreseeable. This is shown through:
Sexual assault cases involve unique considerations:
Oklahoma generally gives two years from the date of the incident to file (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). Sexual assault cases may have extended deadlines under certain circumstances. For children, the statute may be tolled.
We get to work immediately to lock down video evidence, build foreseeability evidence, secure history of incidents, bring in qualified security experts, coordinate civil and criminal cases, protect client privacy in sensitive cases, partner with treating providers, and build each file for the courtroom from the start.
A: Possibly — depends on foreseeability and security failures.
A: Nothing upfront. We only get paid if we win.
A: Possibly — depends on foreseeability and security adequacy.
A: Hotels can be liable for sexual assault. Multiple security failures often create liability.
A: Reasonably predictable. Foreseeability is typically established through prior incidents, neighborhood crime, or specific threats.
A: Wrongful death cases are available for negligent security deaths.
A: Don’t. Talk to a lawyer first.
A: Yes, if safety permits. Document anything you can.
A: Two years from the date of the incident (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). For minors, the deadline may be tolled until age 18.
These cases combine premises liability with criminal conduct by third parties. The case targets the property owner, not the attacker. The case is against the property owner who failed to provide adequate security. These cases operate under specific legal doctrines. A local attorney experienced with these claims brings expertise in this specialized corner of premises liability.
The core question in negligent security involves owner responsibility for criminal acts of others.
The general principle is no liability.
Specific exceptions provide liability paths.
This is the foundational doctrine.
These cases require foreseeability of the criminal act.
Foreseeability requires prior crime evidence.
Certain relationships create elevated duties for security:
Previous criminal activity on the property provides the strongest foreseeability evidence.
Prior crime evidence should include:
Crime in the surrounding area can establish foreseeability when the surrounding area has documented crime.
Area crime evidence sources include:
Direct evidence of the property owner’s awareness can establish foreseeability:
Some properties have inherently elevated security risks:
Robbery incidents.
Assault incidents.
Sexual assault in hotels, apartment complexes, garages, and other premises.
These are particularly serious cases.
Gun violence incidents involve specific issues.
Mass casualty events may create negligent security liability.
Multi-family housing crime drives many cases.
Lodging-related crime can support negligent security claims.
Parking facility crime is a recurring case category.
Workplace violence where premises owners failed to provide security.
Adequate security depends on the property and the specific risk profile.
Elements of adequate security typically include:
Proper lighting.
Poor lighting drives many security failures.
Operational camera coverage.
Cameras must function:
On-site security, particularly for risk-elevated properties.
Entry restrictions.
Working locks.
Emergency communications, including alarm systems.
Landscaping that doesn’t create concealment opportunities.
Security procedures, Training programs, Response procedures.
Inadequate lighting for criminals.
Non-functional cameras provide no security benefit.
Insufficient security staff given the actual risk profile.
Property owners who received security assessments but failed to implement recommendations may face punitive damages.
Broken access controls.
Untrained security personnel.
Property owners who received complaints about crime but failed to respond face heightened liability.
Compensation in these cases include:
Emergency and trauma care, Operating costs, Inpatient care, Rehabilitation costs, ongoing medical care, Psychological care.
Past and future income loss and reduced earning ability.
Pain and suffering damages.
Mental health damages drive significant damages.
Daily life impacts.
Relationship effects.
For fatal cases.
Exemplary damages are particularly common, especially where:
Owners are primary defendants.
Property managers may share fault.
Companies contracted to provide security can face direct liability for inadequate security.
Owners and operators can share liability.
For franchised establishments (hotels, restaurants, etc.), franchisors may face liability in some circumstances.
The primary defense.
Defense argues the criminal act was unforeseeable. Documentation of prior crime defeats this defense.
Defense argues the security provided was reasonable.
“Better security wouldn’t have prevented this”.
Plaintiff conduct defenses.
Sole-criminal-responsibility arguments. This argument generally fails because liability can rest on the property owner regardless of the criminal’s responsibility.
Make sure police are called. Police reports are essential.
Prompt medical evaluation protects the claim.
Comprehensive property documentation.
Security deficiencies.
Visual evidence of every relevant detail.
Bystanders.
Prior crime evidence require investigation.
Mental health care often require significant treatment.
Property owner insurers contact quickly. Statements without counsel can permanently damage the case.
Negligent security attorneys earn fees only on recovery. Specialty expertise costs advanced by the firm.
These cases require quick action.
Surveillance footage gets overwritten quickly.
Security personnel may leave employment requiring prompt investigation.
Property owners often change security after incidents, providing evidence of prior inadequacy.
The legal time limit continues running.
Engaging counsel right away positions the case for the substantial recovery these cases can produce when properly built.
When a robbery happens in a parking lot, hotel hallway, apartment complex, or store, the criminal is rarely the only one responsible. Property owners have a responsibility to provide reasonable security for everyone they invite onto their premises — and when they disregard that duty, foreseeable crimes happen and innocent people get hurt. Negligent security claims emerge when a property had a history of prior crimes that should have prompted action, when known hazards like broken locks, dead security cameras, burned-out parking lot lights, missing security personnel, and unsecured access points were ignored, and when reasonable measures — proper lighting, working surveillance, trained guards, access controls — would have stopped the attack. At McKay Law, we tackle these cases by examining the property’s crime history, prior complaints to management, security audits, police call records, and the owner’s response — or non-response — to known risks. We retain security experts, crime prevention specialists, and former law enforcement to establish exactly what a reasonable owner would have done and why this owner didn’t measure up.
Apartment complexes, hotels, parking garages, shopping centers, bars and nightclubs, ATMs, gas stations, college campuses, and event venues all carry significant legal responsibility for the safety of the people they invite onto their property. When you join the McKay Law family, we pursue compensation that captures the full scope of what was taken from you — physical and emotional. We pursue maximum compensation for emergency care, surgeries, hospitalization, ongoing rehabilitation, future medical needs, prescription costs, counseling and psychiatric care for trauma and PTSD, missed paychecks, diminished earning ability, the life-altering fear, anxiety, and emotional aftermath of being assaulted in a place that was supposed to be safe — and in the most heartbreaking cases, the wrongful death of a precious life. Reach us right away at (866) 679-9651 or reach out online to book your free, confidential consultation and get a firm that considers crimes against innocent victims with the seriousness they deserve on your side.
See why so many others choose McKay Law, PLLC
With over 300 five-star reviews, McKay Law, your local Personal Injury Law Firm has earned the trust and gratitude of our clients. Every case we handle is unique, and every client’s story matters. Don’t just take our word for it—hear directly from our clients about their experiences and why they confidently recommend us to others.
