“Labor Omnia Vincit” McKay Law
Premises liability cases involving criminal attacks are particularly challenging and sensitive in Bixby, OK. When inadequate security measures lead to criminal attacks on innocent victims, the legal path to justice involves proving what should have been prevented. McKay Law fights for negligent security victims throughout OK. Inadequate security claims involve complexities beyond ordinary slip-and-fall matters—showing the owner knew or should have known about the risk and failed to act. These crimes typically occur at properties where owners cut corners on safety despite known risks. Common types of incidents include violent attacks, sexual assaults, robberies, and homicides on unsecured properties. Proving the security failures requires thorough investigation—under premises liability and negligence principles. Our Bixby premises liability attorneys investigate every angle—crime statistics, security audits, employee testimony, and physical evidence from the scene. Negligent security cases often require security experts to demonstrate how proper measures would have prevented the attack. Potential defendants include property owners, property management companies, security companies hired to protect the premises, business operators and tenants, hotel and motel franchises, and parent corporations that set security policies. Insurance complications are common—multiple policies may apply, including general liability and umbrella coverage, and insurers aggressively defend these claims. Victims often suffer catastrophic physical injuries, lasting emotional trauma, and fatalities. We pursue full compensation including medical bills, mental health treatment, lost wages, lost earning capacity, pain and suffering, emotional distress, and wrongful death damages. Property owners and their insurers will fight hard against these claims—you deserve representation that understands how to win these challenging cases. Every negligent security case is handled on a contingency fee basis—zero upfront cost. Reach out to McKay Law right away for a no-cost case review with a Bixby, OK negligent security lawyer who will hold every negligent property owner and entity accountable.
Property owners must provide reasonable security. When inadequate security leads to assaults, robberies, or other criminal acts that injure visitors, owners can be held responsible. These claims are called negligent security claims. Common locations include apartments, hotels, parking lots, malls, and bars where inadequate lighting, broken locks, insufficient cameras, lack of security personnel, or known crime risks lead to violence. McKay Law represents negligent security victims in Bixby and in surrounding communities.
Whether security is “adequate” depends on the circumstances:
For these cases to succeed, the crime must have been foreseeable. This is shown through:
Sexual assault cases have special features:
Oklahoma generally gives two years from the date of the incident to file (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). Different rules may apply for sexual assault cases. For children, the statute may be tolled.
We move quickly to secure surveillance video before it’s deleted, examine crime data, secure history of incidents, bring in qualified security experts, coordinate civil and criminal cases, handle privacy concerns, coordinate with treating physicians and mental health professionals, and treat each matter as trial-ready.
A: Likely yes if you can establish foreseeability and security failures.
A: Nothing upfront. No recovery, no fee.
A: Yes, if the attack was foreseeable and security was inadequate.
A: You may have a strong claim. These cases often involve significant damages.
A: The crime should have been predictable. Foreseeability is shown through evidence of prior crime.
A: Yes — wrongful death claims are available against negligent property owners.
A: Don’t. Refer them to your attorney.
A: Yes, if safety permits. Photograph the scene if it’s safe to do so.
A: Two years from the date of the incident (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). Sexual assault cases may have different deadlines.
Negligent security cases sit at the intersection of premises liability and third-party criminal conduct. The injury was caused by a criminal — but the case isn’t against the criminal. The property owner who created the conditions allowing the attack is the defendant. This legal framework is distinct from standard premises liability. An attorney familiar with this distinctive area knows the specific legal requirements these cases involve.
The central legal issue asks whether owners are responsible for third-party crime.
The general principle is no liability.
Specific exceptions provide liability paths.
Foreseeability is the central concept.
These cases require foreseeable criminal conduct.
Foreseeability requires evidence of prior similar incidents.
Certain relationships create elevated duties for security:
Prior incidents on the premises is the most powerful foreseeability evidence.
Evidence of prior crimes should include:
Area crime statistics can establish foreseeability when the surrounding area has documented crime.
Area crime evidence sources include:
Direct evidence of the property owner’s awareness can establish foreseeability:
Property types with elevated risk:
Robberies at gas stations, ATMs, convenience stores, parking lots.
Assault incidents.
Sexual assault cases.
These are among the most devastating negligent security cases.
Shooting cases create distinct case scenarios.
Mass shooting events may create negligent security liability.
Violence in apartment complexes is a major negligent security category.
Hotel-related violence and theft can support negligent security claims.
Parking-related crime is a recurring case category.
Workplace violence where premises owners failed to provide security.
Security needs are property-specific.
Elements of adequate security typically include:
Adequate exterior and interior lighting.
Poor lighting is a frequent contributing cause.
Operational camera coverage.
Adequate cameras require:
Security guards or personnel, particularly for high-risk properties.
Entry restrictions.
Functional locks on doors, gates, and access points.
Communication infrastructure, including panic buttons.
Maintenance that addresses security.
Documented policies, Training programs, Crisis protocols.
Poor lighting creates concealment opportunities for criminals.
Cameras that don’t work don’t deter crime.
Inadequate guards for the property’s risk level.
Property owners who received security assessments but failed to implement recommendations carry greater exposure.
Locks that don’t work.
Security personnel inadequately trained.
Disregarded complaints carry greater exposure.
Negligent security damages can be substantial include:
Emergency and trauma care, surgical costs, hospitalization, Physical and other rehabilitation, ongoing medical care, Psychological care.
Lost wages and diminished earning capacity.
Pain damages.
PTSD is common after negligent security incidents drive significant damages.
Daily life impacts.
Relationship effects.
For fatal cases.
Punitive damages are particularly available, especially where:
Property owners carry primary liability.
Property management companies carry liability.
Security contractors may bear primary responsibility for service deficiencies.
Different parties may own and operate the property can share liability.
Franchise operators, franchisors may face liability in some circumstances.
The fundamental defense.
“How could we have known?”. Documentation of prior crime defeats this defense.
Defense argues the security provided was reasonable.
Defense argues no causal connection between security failures and the criminal act.
“You contributed to your own harm”.
Sole-criminal-responsibility arguments. This defense generally fails.
Don’t accept informal handling. Official reports matter.
Prompt medical evaluation is essential.
Property-related details.
Specific security failures observed before, during, or after the incident.
Lighting conditions, camera locations, access controls, and security features.
Bystanders.
Prior crime evidence should be gathered.
Mental health care require professional care.
Property owner insurers contact quickly. Recorded statements before legal advice can permanently damage the case.
Counsel handling these cases work on contingency. These cases require significant investment in security experts, crime analysts, and other experts paid by counsel.
Evidence has preservation windows.
Camera evidence gets overwritten quickly.
Employee turnover requiring prompt investigation.
Property owners may modify security, which can be used as evidence of inadequacy.
Filing deadlines sets a hard cutoff.
Getting an attorney involved promptly locks down the critical evidence.
When a shooting happens in a parking lot, hotel hallway, apartment complex, or store, the criminal is rarely the only one responsible. Property owners have a responsibility to maintain reasonable security for everyone they invite onto their premises — and when they disregard that duty, foreseeable crimes happen and innocent people get hurt. Negligent security claims come about when a property had a track record of prior crimes that should have prompted action, when known hazards like broken locks, dead security cameras, burned-out parking lot lights, missing security personnel, and unsecured access points were never fixed, and when reasonable measures — proper lighting, working surveillance, trained guards, access controls — would have avoided the attack. At McKay Law, we tackle these cases by investigating the property’s crime history, prior complaints to management, security audits, police call records, and the owner’s response — or non-response — to known risks. We work with security experts, crime prevention specialists, and former law enforcement to confirm exactly what a reasonable owner would have done and why this owner fell short.
Apartment complexes, hotels, parking garages, shopping centers, bars and nightclubs, ATMs, gas stations, college campuses, and event venues all carry significant legal responsibility for the safety of the people they invite onto their property. When you partner with the McKay Law family, we fight for compensation that reflects the full scope of what was taken from you — physical and emotional. We fight for complete compensation for emergency care, surgeries, hospitalization, ongoing rehabilitation, future medical needs, prescription costs, counseling and psychiatric care for trauma and PTSD, time away from work, diminished earning ability, the profound fear, anxiety, and emotional aftermath of being assaulted in a place that was supposed to be safe — and in the most sorrowful cases, the wrongful death of someone you cared deeply for. Contact us without waiting at (866) 679-9651 or contact us online to set up your free, confidential consultation and put a firm that treats crimes against innocent victims with the urgency they deserve on your side.
See why so many others choose McKay Law, PLLC
With over 300 five-star reviews, McKay Law, your local Personal Injury Law Firm has earned the trust and gratitude of our clients. Every case we handle is unique, and every client’s story matters. Don’t just take our word for it—hear directly from our clients about their experiences and why they confidently recommend us to others.
