“Labor Omnia Vincit” McKay Law
Premises liability cases involving criminal attacks are among the most complex and emotionally difficult types of personal injury cases in Choctaw, OK. When inadequate security measures lead to criminal attacks on innocent victims, the legal path to justice involves proving what should have been prevented. McKay Law fights for negligent security victims throughout OK. These cases are fundamentally different from typical premises liability claims—proving foreseeability, establishing the property owner’s duty, and connecting security failures to the criminal act. These crimes typically occur at residential properties, commercial businesses, hospitality venues, and public gathering places. Negligent security claims frequently include assaults and batteries in poorly lit parking lots, sexual assaults in apartment buildings with broken locks, shootings at venues with inadequate security personnel, robberies at businesses without cameras or alarms, and wrongful death from preventable attacks. Proving the security failures demands experienced legal work—with foreseeability being the central legal question. Our Choctaw negligent security attorneys act quickly to secure proof—the proof needed to establish what the owner knew and what they failed to do. Complex premises claims demand expert analysis to establish the standard of care. Liable parties may include landlords, management firms, security contractors, and corporate entities responsible for safety. Insurance complications are common—making thorough investigation of all available insurance critical. Common harm includes life-altering harm—both physical wounds and profound psychological impact. We pursue full compensation including economic and non-economic losses from every responsible party. Property owners and their insurers will fight hard against these claims—you deserve representation that understands how to win these challenging cases. All inadequate security claims is handled on a no-win, no-fee basis—you pay nothing unless we win. Call McKay Law now for a complimentary evaluation with a Choctaw, OK premises liability attorney who will pursue every responsible party.
Property owners have a legal duty to protect visitors from foreseeable criminal acts. When inadequate security leads to assaults, robberies, or other criminal acts that injure visitors, owners can be held responsible. This is called negligent security. These cases often involve apartments, hotels, retail, and other commercial properties where poor security led to crime. McKay Law represents negligent security victims in Choctaw and throughout Oklahoma.
Security must be reasonable under the circumstances:
For these cases to succeed, foreseeability must be established. This can be shown through:
These cases have unique aspects:
You typically have 2 years from the date of the incident to file (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). Different rules may apply for sexual assault cases. For child victims, the limitations period may extend.
We act fast to preserve camera footage, examine crime data, pull prior complaints and incident reports, bring in qualified security experts, coordinate with criminal cases when appropriate, protect client privacy in sensitive cases, partner with treating providers, and build each file for the courtroom from the start.
A: Possibly — depends on foreseeability and security failures.
A: Zero upfront. No fee unless we recover.
A: Possibly — depends on foreseeability and security adequacy.
A: Hotels can be liable for sexual assault. These cases often involve significant damages.
A: The crime was reasonably foreseeable. Foreseeability is typically established through prior incidents, neighborhood crime, or specific threats.
A: File a wrongful death claim if the property owner was negligent.
A: No. Call us first.
A: Yes, in any way you can. Photograph the scene if it’s safe to do so.
A: Two years from the date of the incident (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). Don’t wait — evidence and surveillance video disappear quickly.
These cases combine premises liability with criminal conduct by third parties. The case targets the property owner, not the attacker. The property owner who created the conditions allowing the attack is the defendant. This legal framework is distinct from standard premises liability. An attorney familiar with this distinctive area builds these cases around the actual legal framework.
The core question in negligent security is whether property owners can be liable for criminal acts committed by third parties.
General rule: property owners generally aren’t liable for criminal acts of third parties.
But several theories create exceptions.
The central legal concept in negligent security.
Owner liability attaches when the criminal act was foreseeable.
Foreseeability requires prior similar criminal activity.
Some relationships create heightened duties for security:
Previous criminal activity on the property establishes foreseeability directly.
Evidence of prior crimes should include:
Neighborhood crime data can establish foreseeability when the surrounding area has documented crime.
Sources for area crime data include:
Evidence the owner knew about crime can establish foreseeability:
Some properties have inherently elevated security risks:
Robbery incidents.
Physical assault cases.
Sexual victimization.
These are among the most devastating negligent security cases.
Gun violence incidents present specific challenges.
Active shooter incidents can support negligent security claims.
Multi-family housing crime generates significant case volume.
Hotel-related violence and theft can support negligent security claims.
Parking lot and garage crime generates significant case volume.
Workplace violence where premises owners failed to provide security.
Adequate security depends on the property and the specific risk profile.
Elements of adequate security typically include:
Lighting infrastructure.
Inadequate lighting drives many security failures.
Working camera systems.
Cameras must function:
Security staff, particularly for high-risk properties.
Access controls.
Operational locking systems.
Communication infrastructure, including panic buttons.
Proper landscaping.
Security procedures, Security training, Response procedures.
Insufficient lighting for criminals.
Cameras that don’t work fail to provide evidence after crimes.
Insufficient personnel for the property’s risk level.
Implementation failures face heightened liability.
Inadequate access control systems.
Security personnel inadequately trained.
Property owners who received complaints about crime but failed to respond are exposed to enhanced damages.
Compensation in these cases include:
Initial emergency treatment, surgical costs, Hospital stays, rehabilitation, ongoing medical care, mental health treatment (often substantial).
Past and future income loss and diminished earning capacity.
Pain and suffering damages.
Psychological consequences drive significant damages.
Effects on daily life and activities.
Relationship effects.
For fatal cases.
Negligent security cases frequently support punitive damages, especially where:
Property owners carry primary liability.
Management firms carry liability.
Security service providers may bear primary responsibility for security service failures.
Owners and operators can share liability.
Franchise operators, brand owners may share fault.
The primary defense.
Defense argues the criminal act was unforeseeable. Documentation of prior crime defeats this defense.
Defense argues the security provided was reasonable.
“Better security wouldn’t have prevented this”.
Comparative fault arguments.
Defense argues only the criminal is responsible. Property owners can be liable alongside criminals.
Insist on law enforcement involvement. Police reports are essential.
Same-day medical care matters significantly.
The location, lighting, cameras, security personnel, access controls, and overall security.
What was inadequate.
Lighting conditions, camera locations, access controls, and security features.
Bystanders.
Crime history require investigation.
Psychological treatment need professional attention.
Insurance company representatives. Statements without counsel create problematic admissions.
Negligent security attorneys charge no upfront fees. These cases require significant investment in security experts, crime analysts, and other experts advanced by the firm.
These cases require quick action.
Video recordings gets overwritten quickly.
Employee turnover making them harder to locate.
Property owners may modify security, which can be used as evidence of inadequacy.
Filing deadlines continues running.
Engaging counsel right away locks down the critical evidence.
When a shooting happens in a parking lot, hotel hallway, apartment complex, or store, the criminal is rarely the only one responsible. Property owners have a responsibility to provide reasonable security for everyone they invite onto their premises — and when they neglect that duty, foreseeable crimes happen and innocent people get hurt. Negligent security claims develop when a property had a history of prior crimes that should have prompted action, when known hazards like broken locks, dead security cameras, burned-out parking lot lights, missing security personnel, and unsecured access points were deferred, and when reasonable measures — proper lighting, working surveillance, trained guards, access controls — would have deterred the attack. At McKay Law, we handle these cases by investigating the property’s crime history, prior complaints to management, security audits, police call records, and the owner’s response — or non-response — to known risks. We retain security experts, crime prevention specialists, and former law enforcement to establish exactly what a reasonable owner would have done and why this owner came up short.
Apartment complexes, hotels, parking garages, shopping centers, bars and nightclubs, ATMs, gas stations, college campuses, and event venues all carry major legal responsibility for the safety of the people they invite onto their property. When you come into the McKay Law family, we chase compensation that captures the full scope of what was taken from you — physical and emotional. We demand complete compensation for emergency care, surgeries, hospitalization, ongoing rehabilitation, future medical needs, prescription costs, counseling and psychiatric care for trauma and PTSD, time away from work, lost earning capacity, the enduring fear, anxiety, and emotional aftermath of being assaulted in a place that was supposed to be safe — and in the most tragic cases, the wrongful death of a family member. Contact us without waiting at (866) 679-9651 or reach out online to set up your free, confidential consultation and put a firm that regards crimes against innocent victims with the gravity they deserve on your side.
See why so many others choose McKay Law, PLLC
With over 300 five-star reviews, McKay Law, your local Personal Injury Law Firm has earned the trust and gratitude of our clients. Every case we handle is unique, and every client’s story matters. Don’t just take our word for it—hear directly from our clients about their experiences and why they confidently recommend us to others.
