“Labor Omnia Vincit” McKay Law
Inadequate security claims are particularly challenging and sensitive in Collinsville, OK. When property owners fail to provide reasonable security and someone is assaulted, robbed, or killed, holding the property owner accountable becomes critical. McKay Law represents negligent security victims throughout OK. Negligent security cases present unique challenges—showing the owner knew or should have known about the risk and failed to act. Inadequate security claims frequently arise from residential properties, commercial businesses, hospitality venues, and public gathering places. These cases can involve violent attacks, sexual assaults, robberies, and homicides on unsecured properties. Determining liability takes specialized expertise—under premises liability and negligence principles. Our Collinsville negligent security attorneys investigate every angle—police reports of prior crimes on or near the property, surveillance footage, security personnel records, maintenance logs for locks and lighting, witness statements, and property management communications. These cases typically need industry specialists to demonstrate how proper measures would have prevented the attack. We pursue claims against every party whose decisions or inaction contributed to the dangerous conditions. These claims involve coverage issues—with coverage disputes over intentional acts exclusions and additional insured issues. Victims often suffer life-altering harm—both physical wounds and profound psychological impact. We recover all available damages including medical bills, mental health treatment, lost wages, lost earning capacity, pain and suffering, emotional distress, and wrongful death damages. Defendants will try to blame only the criminal attacker—you deserve representation that understands how to win these challenging cases. All inadequate security claims is handled on a contingency fee basis—zero upfront cost. Call McKay Law now for a free consultation with a Collinsville, OK premises liability attorney who will hold every negligent property owner and entity accountable.
Property owners have a legal duty to protect visitors from foreseeable criminal acts. When security failures lead to crime victimization, the property owner can be held liable. These are negligent security cases. Negligent security cases involve apartment complexes, hotels, parking lots, shopping centers, bars, nightclubs, and other locations where poor security led to crime. McKay Law represents negligent security victims in Collinsville and throughout Oklahoma.
Security must be reasonable under the circumstances:
For these cases to succeed, you must establish that the crime was foreseeable. This can be shown through:
These cases have unique aspects:
The deadline in Oklahoma is two years from the date of the incident to file (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). Sexual assault cases may have extended deadlines under certain circumstances. For child victims, the limitations period may extend.
We move quickly to lock down video evidence, build foreseeability evidence, obtain prior complaints, retain security experts, work with criminal proceedings, protect client privacy in sensitive cases, work with medical and mental health providers, and build each file for the courtroom from the start.
A: Likely yes if you can establish foreseeability and security failures.
A: Zero upfront. No fee unless we recover.
A: Yes, in qualifying cases.
A: Hotels can be liable for sexual assault. These cases often involve significant damages.
A: Reasonably predictable. Foreseeability is typically established through prior incidents, neighborhood crime, or specific threats.
A: Wrongful death cases are available for negligent security deaths.
A: No. Talk to a lawyer first.
A: Yes — when possible. Visual evidence of inadequate security is important.
A: Two years from the date of the incident (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). For minors, the deadline may be tolled until age 18.
Negligent security is a specialized form of premises liability. The injury was caused by a criminal — but the case isn’t against the criminal. The case is against the property owner who failed to provide adequate security. This is its own area of law. A local attorney experienced with these claims builds these cases around the actual legal framework.
The core question in negligent security is whether property owners can be liable for criminal acts committed by third parties.
General rule: property owners generally aren’t liable for criminal acts of third parties.
Multiple exceptions apply.
The central legal concept in negligent security.
These cases require foreseeability of the criminal act.
Foreseeability is shown through evidence of prior similar incidents.
Certain relationships create elevated duties for security:
Prior incidents on the premises establishes foreseeability directly.
Evidence of prior crimes should include:
Area crime statistics can establish foreseeability when the surrounding area has documented crime.
Sources for area crime data include:
Evidence the owner knew about crime can establish foreseeability:
Some properties have inherently elevated security risks:
Robbery incidents.
Physical assault cases.
Sexual assault cases.
These are particularly serious cases.
Gun violence incidents involve specific issues.
Mass casualty events generate negligent security claims.
Multi-family housing crime generates significant case volume.
Hotel-related violence and theft can support negligent security claims.
Parking lot and garage crime generates significant case volume.
Employer-related workplace violence.
Adequacy varies by property type.
Security components include:
Adequate exterior and interior lighting.
Inadequate lighting is a frequent contributing cause.
Operational camera coverage.
Cameras must function:
On-site security, particularly for risk-elevated properties.
Access controls.
Working locks.
Emergency communications, including alarm systems.
Landscaping that doesn’t create concealment opportunities.
Security procedures, Training programs, incident response protocols.
Inadequate lighting for criminals.
Cameras that don’t work fail to provide evidence after crimes.
Inadequate guards considering risk.
Property owners who received security assessments but failed to implement recommendations face heightened liability.
Inadequate access control systems.
Untrained security personnel.
Disregarded complaints face heightened liability.
Recoverable losses include include:
Initial emergency treatment, surgical costs, hospitalization, rehabilitation, Long-term medical needs, mental health treatment (often substantial).
Lost wages and long-term wage impact.
Physical pain and suffering.
PTSD is common after negligent security incidents drive significant damages.
Loss of enjoyment.
Spousal damages.
Wrongful death claims.
Negligent security cases frequently support punitive damages, especially where:
The property owner is the primary defendant.
Property managers carry liability.
Security contractors may bear primary responsibility for inadequate security.
Different parties may own and operate the property can share liability.
For franchised establishments (hotels, restaurants, etc.), franchisors may face liability in some circumstances.
The primary defense.
Foreseeability challenges. Documentation of prior crime defeats this defense.
Defense argues the security provided was reasonable.
“Better security wouldn’t have prevented this”.
“You contributed to your own harm”.
Sole-criminal-responsibility arguments. This argument generally fails because liability can rest on the property owner regardless of the criminal’s responsibility.
Insist on law enforcement involvement. Police reports are essential.
Prompt medical evaluation protects the claim.
Property-related details.
Security deficiencies.
Visual evidence of every relevant detail.
Other people at the property.
Prior crime evidence should be gathered.
Psychological treatment require professional care.
Insurance company representatives. Recorded statements before legal advice can permanently damage the case.
Counsel handling these cases work on contingency. These cases require significant investment in security experts, crime analysts, and other experts advanced by the firm.
Evidence has preservation windows.
Camera evidence gets overwritten quickly.
Personnel changes requiring prompt investigation.
Property owners often change security after incidents, which can be used as evidence of inadequacy.
The legal time limit continues running.
Engaging counsel right away locks down the critical evidence.
When a assault happens in a parking lot, hotel hallway, apartment complex, or store, the criminal is rarely the only one responsible. Property owners have a legal duty to keep reasonable security for everyone they invite onto their premises — and when they neglect that duty, foreseeable crimes happen and innocent people get hurt. Negligent security claims develop when a property had a pattern of prior crimes that should have prompted action, when known hazards like broken locks, dead security cameras, burned-out parking lot lights, missing security personnel, and unsecured access points were left unaddressed, and when reasonable measures — proper lighting, working surveillance, trained guards, access controls — would have stopped the attack. At McKay Law, we handle these cases by examining the property’s crime history, prior complaints to management, security audits, police call records, and the owner’s response — or non-response — to known risks. We consult security experts, crime prevention specialists, and former law enforcement to demonstrate exactly what a reasonable owner would have done and why this owner failed.
Apartment complexes, hotels, parking garages, shopping centers, bars and nightclubs, ATMs, gas stations, college campuses, and event venues all carry significant legal responsibility for the safety of the people they invite onto their property. When you come into the McKay Law family, we fight for compensation that conveys the full scope of what was taken from you — physical and emotional. We chase complete compensation for emergency care, surgeries, hospitalization, ongoing rehabilitation, future medical needs, prescription costs, counseling and psychiatric care for trauma and PTSD, time away from work, diminished earning ability, the life-altering fear, anxiety, and emotional aftermath of being assaulted in a place that was supposed to be safe — and in the most heartbreaking cases, the wrongful death of a precious life. Call us today at (866) 679-9651 or connect with us online to set up your free, confidential consultation and put a firm that treats crimes against innocent victims with the seriousness they deserve in your corner.
See why so many others choose McKay Law, PLLC
With over 300 five-star reviews, McKay Law, your local Personal Injury Law Firm has earned the trust and gratitude of our clients. Every case we handle is unique, and every client’s story matters. Don’t just take our word for it—hear directly from our clients about their experiences and why they confidently recommend us to others.
