Recovering Damages From a Drugged Driver Wreck in Del City, OK
Drugged driving has surpassed drunk driving in the proportion of impaired-driving fatalities in recent years. Yet drugged driving cases are systematically harder to prove than DUI cases. Insurers and defense counsel know this and exploit the proof gaps. A Del City drugged driving accident lawyer knows how to overcome the proof challenges.
Drugged Driving Isn’t Just Illegal Drugs
The widespread misunderstanding is that drugged driving means illegal narcotics. It doesn’t.
Prescription Medications
Legal prescription drugs frequently impair driving. Common impairing prescriptions include:
- Prescription opioids
- Anti-anxiety medications
- Prescription sleep aids
- Prescription muscle relaxants
- Mental health prescriptions
- Sedating allergy treatments
- ADHD medications (especially when misused)
- Headache prescriptions
- Anticonvulsants
Over-the-Counter Medications
Non-prescription medications can be drugged driving substances:
- Sedating cold and allergy medications
- Dextromethorphan (DXM) in cough medicines
- Sleep aids (Tylenol PM, Nyquil)
- Dramamine and similar products
Recreational Drugs
Drugs of abuse include cannabis products in any form, cocaine and crack, methamphetamine, heroin and other opioids, psychedelics, synthetic drugs (synthetic cannabinoids, bath salts), dissociative drugs, and huffing-type drugs.
Why Drugged Driving Cases Are Harder to Prove Than DUI Cases
No Equivalent of the .08 BAC Standard
For alcohol, there’s a clear legal limit. For drugs, no equivalent standard exists for most substances. Marijuana per se laws exist in some states, but these are controversial because THC metabolism doesn’t track impairment well.
For nearly all drugs other than marijuana in some states, impairment must be demonstrated.
Detection Difficulties
Blood and urine tests can detect drug presence, but detection of presence doesn’t equal proof of impairment.
Marijuana metabolites can be detected for days or weeks after use. This makes it scientifically problematic to argue that detected THC proves impairment at the time of the crash.
Other drugs have varying detection windows. Some have short detection windows, some are detectable for extended periods.
Testing Isn’t Routine
Breath testing for alcohol is standard. Drug testing isn’t always conducted. Without testing, the case must be built from other evidence.
Drug Recognition Experts (DREs)
DREs conduct specialized assessments. DRE evaluations provide valuable evidence when conducted. Not every jurisdiction has DREs available.
Defense Challenges
Defense routinely attacks drug impairment evidence:
- “Presence isn’t impairment”
- Lab procedure attacks
- “Doctor-prescribed medication”
- “You can’t prove impairment at the crash moment”
How These Cases Get Built
Toxicology Evidence
If toxicology was performed, the toxicology becomes central evidence.
However, toxicology must be interpreted carefully. Forensic toxicology experts interpret the results in context.
Observable Impairment
Officer observations are often case-defining.
Observable impairment indicators include:
- Slurred speech
- Glassy or bloodshot eyes
- Coordination problems
- Behavioral indicators
- Loss of consciousness
- Erratic driving patterns observed before the crash
- SFST failures
- Physical signs (dilated pupils, constricted pupils, sweating, agitation)
Pre-Crash Driving Behavior
Eyewitness reports of driving provide important context. Erratic lane keeping, slow reactions, unusual stopping or starting provide circumstantial evidence.
Criminal Charges
Driver’s criminal liability can substantially support the civil case. Adjudicated criminal cases carry significant weight in subsequent civil litigation.
Driver Statements and Admissions
Self-reported drug use provide direct proof.
Medical Records
The driver’s medical records may reveal prescription medications, drug abuse history, or related medical context.
Vehicle Evidence
Items in the driver’s possession build the impairment case.
Punitive Damages and Drugged Driving
These cases often involve egregious conduct supporting punitive damages. The decision to drive while drugged typically supports gross negligence findings.
These damages can transform case value in serious drugged driving cases.
Common Insurance Defenses
“There’s No Proof of Impairment”
Defense counsel’s primary argument. Defense argues that even if drugs were present, impairment wasn’t proven.
“The Medication Was Taken as Prescribed”
For prescription drug cases, Prescription compliance defense. Prescription compliance doesn’t necessarily negate impairment. Even properly prescribed and properly taken medications can impair driving.
“Comparative Fault”
Defense pushes shared-fault arguments.
“The Crash Wasn’t Caused by Drug Impairment”
“Drugs didn’t cause the crash”. Forensic analysis of impairment-crash connection defeats causation challenges.
Critical Steps After a Drugged Driving Crash
Get the Police Report
Get the official report. Pay attention to impairment observations.
Document Witness Observations
People who saw the impaired driver before or at the scene can establish impairment when toxicology is unavailable.
Preserve the Vehicle Evidence
Physical evidence in the vehicle can provide direct evidence.
Document Driver Statements
Self-reported information from the other driver.
Photograph the Scene
Comprehensive scene documentation.
Get Medical Attention Immediately
Quick medical attention establishes the injury timeline.
Track the Criminal Case
The criminal proceedings can substantially support the civil case.
Don’t Wait to Get Legal Help
Toxicology and other evidence has time-sensitive preservation requirements.
Damages Available
These claims can pursue the typical categories plus enhanced damages:
- Comprehensive medical care
- Earnings affected by injury
- Diminished earning capacity
- Vehicle repair or replacement
- Loss of enjoyment of life
- Loss of consortium
- Exemplary damages — often substantial in drug-impaired driving cases
Dram Shop and Third-Party Liability
For prescription drug scenarios, there may be third-party liability. Negligent prescribing claims may create medical malpractice issues.
Attorney Costs
Counsel handling these cases work on contingency. Free initial consultations are standard. Specialty expertise costs advanced by the firm.
Move Quickly
Drug evidence has time-sensitive preservation issues. Investigation records become harder to obtain. OK’s statute of limitations applies regardless. Engaging counsel right away preserves every angle of the case.