“Labor Omnia Vincit” McKay Law
Negligent security cases are among the most complex and emotionally difficult types of personal injury cases in Jenks, OK. When property owners fail to provide reasonable security and someone is assaulted, robbed, or killed, liability extends beyond just the criminal attacker. McKay Law represents negligent security victims throughout OK. Inadequate security claims involve complexities beyond ordinary slip-and-fall matters—showing the owner knew or should have known about the risk and failed to act. These crimes typically occur at properties where owners cut corners on safety despite known risks. Common types of incidents include criminal acts that reasonable security measures would have prevented or deterred. Determining liability demands experienced legal work—often involving review of prior crime history, security policies, and industry standards. Our Jenks inadequate security lawyers investigate every angle—the proof needed to establish what the owner knew and what they failed to do. Complex premises claims demand expert analysis to establish the standard of care. We pursue claims against every party whose decisions or inaction contributed to the dangerous conditions. These claims involve coverage issues—multiple policies may apply, including general liability and umbrella coverage, and insurers aggressively defend these claims. Victims often suffer gunshot wounds, traumatic brain injuries from beatings, sexual assault trauma, stab wounds, broken bones, severe psychological injuries including PTSD, and wrongful death. We pursue full compensation including hospital costs, ongoing therapy, missed income, suffering, and survivor damages. Property owners and their insurers will fight hard against these claims—you need legal counsel experienced with premises liability litigation. All inadequate security claims is handled on a contingency basis—zero upfront cost. Call McKay Law now for a complimentary evaluation with a Jenks, OK premises liability attorney who will pursue every responsible party.
Property owners must provide reasonable security. When inadequate security leads to assaults, robberies, or other criminal acts that injure visitors, legal liability can follow. These claims are called negligent security claims. Negligent security cases involve apartment complexes, hotels, parking lots, shopping centers, bars, nightclubs, and other locations where poor security led to crime. McKay Law advocates for negligent security victims in Jenks and in surrounding communities.
Adequate security depends on the situation:
For these cases to succeed, you must establish that the crime was foreseeable. This can be shown through:
Sexual assault cases have special features:
The deadline in Oklahoma is 2 years from the date of the incident to file (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). Sexual assault cases may have extended deadlines under certain circumstances. For child victims, the limitations period may extend.
We act fast to secure surveillance video before it’s deleted, examine crime data, pull prior complaints and incident reports, engage expert security consultants, coordinate civil and criminal cases, handle privacy concerns, coordinate with treating physicians and mental health professionals, and treat each matter as trial-ready.
A: Likely yes if you can establish foreseeability and security failures.
A: Zero upfront. No fee unless we recover.
A: Possibly — depends on foreseeability and security adequacy.
A: Hotels can be liable for sexual assault. Inadequate security, broken locks, untrained staff, or failure to address known dangers can all create liability.
A: Reasonably predictable. We prove foreseeability through investigation.
A: Yes — wrongful death claims are available against negligent property owners.
A: Don’t. Talk to a lawyer first.
A: Yes — when possible. Document anything you can.
A: 2 years from the date of the incident (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). Sexual assault cases may have different deadlines.
These cases combine premises liability with criminal conduct by third parties. The case targets the property owner, not the attacker. The case is against the property owner who failed to provide adequate security. This is its own area of law. A local attorney experienced with these claims brings expertise in this specialized corner of premises liability.
The defining legal question involves owner responsibility for criminal acts of others.
Default rule.
Multiple exceptions apply.
This is the foundational doctrine.
Property owners can be liable for criminal acts by third parties when foreseeability of the criminal act.
Foreseeability requires prior similar criminal activity.
Certain relationships create elevated duties regarding security:
Prior crime on the property provides the strongest foreseeability evidence.
Evidence of prior crimes should include:
Crime in the surrounding area can establish foreseeability when the property is in a high-crime area.
Area crime evidence sources include:
Evidence the owner knew about crime can establish foreseeability:
Risk-elevated property types:
Robbery incidents.
Assault incidents.
Sexual assault cases.
These are among the most devastating negligent security cases.
Shooting cases present specific challenges.
Active shooter incidents may create negligent security liability.
Apartment-related crime drives many cases.
Lodging-related crime can support negligent security claims.
Parking facility crime drives many cases.
Workplace crime cases.
Adequate security depends on the property and the specific risk profile.
Security components include:
Proper lighting.
Inadequate lighting drives many security failures.
Functional surveillance camera systems.
Cameras must be:
Security staff, particularly for high-risk properties.
Entry restrictions.
Operational locking systems.
Emergency communications, including alarm systems.
Maintenance that addresses security.
Written security policies, staff training on security procedures, Response procedures.
Inadequate lighting for criminals.
Non-functional cameras don’t deter crime.
Insufficient security staff for the property’s risk level.
Property owners who received security assessments but failed to implement recommendations face heightened liability.
Broken access controls.
Untrained security personnel.
Disregarded complaints are exposed to enhanced damages.
Recoverable losses include include:
Trauma center care, Surgery expenses, Hospital stays, rehabilitation, ongoing medical care, Mental health damages.
Past and future income loss and diminished earning capacity.
Physical pain and suffering.
Psychological consequences can be substantial.
Effects on daily life and activities.
Relationship effects.
For fatal cases.
Negligent security cases frequently support punitive damages, especially where:
Owners are primary defendants.
Property management companies can share liability.
Security contractors may bear primary responsibility for inadequate security.
Different parties may own and operate the property may share fault.
For franchised establishments (hotels, restaurants, etc.), franchisors may face liability in some circumstances.
Defense’s main argument.
Foreseeability challenges. Prior crime evidence overcomes this defense.
“We had adequate security”.
“Better security wouldn’t have prevented this”.
Plaintiff conduct defenses.
Sole-criminal-responsibility arguments. Property owners can be liable alongside criminals.
Make sure police are called. Crime reports are critical.
Same-day medical care protects the claim.
Comprehensive property documentation.
Security deficiencies.
Visual evidence of every relevant detail.
Independent observers.
Crime history can be researched.
PTSD and other psychological consequences need professional attention.
Property owner insurers contact quickly. Statements without counsel hurt the claim.
Lawyers experienced with negligent security earn fees only on recovery. These cases require significant investment in security experts, crime analysts, and other experts paid by counsel.
These cases require quick action.
Camera evidence has limited retention.
Security personnel may leave employment making them harder to locate.
Property owners often change security after incidents, though such changes don’t typically establish liability directly.
OK’s statute of limitations continues running.
Getting an attorney involved promptly triggers preservation steps.
When a robbery happens in a parking lot, hotel hallway, apartment complex, or store, the criminal is rarely the only one responsible. Property owners have a legal obligation to maintain reasonable security for everyone they invite onto their premises — and when they skip that duty, foreseeable crimes happen and innocent people get hurt. Negligent security claims arise when a property had a series of prior crimes that should have prompted action, when known hazards like broken locks, dead security cameras, burned-out parking lot lights, missing security personnel, and unsecured access points were never fixed, and when reasonable measures — proper lighting, working surveillance, trained guards, access controls — would have prevented the attack. At McKay Law, we tackle these cases by examining the property’s crime history, prior complaints to management, security audits, police call records, and the owner’s response — or non-response — to known risks. We partner with security experts, crime prevention specialists, and former law enforcement to confirm exactly what a reasonable owner would have done and why this owner didn’t measure up.
Apartment complexes, hotels, parking garages, shopping centers, bars and nightclubs, ATMs, gas stations, college campuses, and event venues all carry serious legal responsibility for the safety of the people they invite onto their property. When you join the McKay Law family, we demand compensation that reflects the full scope of what was taken from you — physical and emotional. We demand the highest possible compensation for emergency care, surgeries, hospitalization, ongoing rehabilitation, future medical needs, prescription costs, counseling and psychiatric care for trauma and PTSD, lost wages, lost earning capacity, the life-altering fear, anxiety, and emotional aftermath of being assaulted in a place that was supposed to be safe — and in the most devastating cases, the wrongful death of a loved one. Phone us without waiting at (866) 679-9651 or get in touch online to schedule your free, confidential consultation and place a firm that regards crimes against innocent victims with the seriousness they deserve on your side.
See why so many others choose McKay Law, PLLC
With over 300 five-star reviews, McKay Law, your local Personal Injury Law Firm has earned the trust and gratitude of our clients. Every case we handle is unique, and every client’s story matters. Don’t just take our word for it—hear directly from our clients about their experiences and why they confidently recommend us to others.
