Compensation After a Distracted Driving Crash in Lawton, OK
Distracted driving has overtaken drunk driving as a leading cause of crashes in many categories. It’s also one of the most proveable forms of negligence. A Lawton car accident attorney knows how to find the digital fingerprints distraction leaves behind.
What Counts as Distracted Driving?
“Distraction” includes any task taking the driver’s focus off the road.
Three Types of Distraction
Distraction has three forms:
Visual Distraction
Visual distractions remove the driver’s gaze from traffic. This category covers adjusting infotainment systems.
Manual Distraction
Hands-off-wheel distractions. Examples include eating.
Cognitive Distraction
Mind-off-driving distractions. These include fatigue-related mental wandering.
Phone use simultaneously involves visual, manual, and cognitive distraction.
Common Distracted Driving Activities
- Text-based communication
- Voice communication via phone
- Browsing apps
- Reading or sending emails
- Streaming media
- Navigation app interaction
- Touchscreen interaction with vehicle systems
- Consuming food or beverages
- Personal grooming
- Reading materials
- Interacting with passengers (especially children or pets)
- Searching for items
- Lighting cigarettes
- Driving under strong emotion
- Daydreaming or “highway hypnosis”
Why Distracted Driving Cases Are Often Easier to Prove
The Digital Trail
Modern distraction is often digitally recorded. In contrast to behaviors that fade without trace, the evidence often exists in retrievable digital form.
Cell Phone Records
Phone carrier data reveal phone activity at the time of the crash. This evidence is typically definitive.
Texting and App Records
SMS and chat logs can be subpoenaed from carriers. App usage data from social media and other applications are subject to subpoena.
Vehicle Infotainment Data
Infotainment systems log user activity. Touchscreen interactions, music selections, and navigation use may be recoverable.
Surveillance and Dashcam Evidence
Storefront security cameras may document the driver’s actions at the wheel.
Witness Observations
Witness statements provide direct evidence of distraction.
Driver Admissions
Admissions in various forms becomes powerful evidence.
The Legal Framework
OK Distracted Driving Laws
The state has specific anti-distraction statutes. Many states ban specific forms of distraction. Distracted driving violations can support negligence per se.
Negligence Per Se
If the driver broke a statute, the breach creates per se negligence. The violation removes the duty-and-breach question.
General Negligence
Even without a specific statutory violation, distracted driving violates the general duty of care. Common-law negligence demands focused attention on the driving task.
Common Insurance Defenses
“There’s No Proof My Driver Was Distracted”
This is the most common defense. Building the evidence case is the answer to this defense.
“The Crash Would Have Happened Anyway”
Causation defense. “Distraction wasn’t a substantial factor”.
Expert analysis of perception-reaction time establishes the connection.
“Hands-Free Made It Safe”
Defense sometimes argues hands-free phone use isn’t really distraction.
Research demonstrates hands-free isn’t actually safe. Even hands-free phone use significantly impairs driving.
“The Plaintiff Was Distracted Too”
Defense pushes shared-fault claims. How OK handles shared fault may cut damages without barring the claim.
Severity Patterns in Distracted Driving Crashes
Rear-End Collisions
Eyes-off-road distraction drives most rear-end collisions. The driver fails to perceive the stopped or slowing traffic.
Lane Departure Crashes
Cognitive and visual distraction leads to drifting into oncoming traffic.
Failure-to-Yield Crashes
Distraction-related yield failures account for many failure-to-yield crashes.
Pedestrian and Cyclist Crashes
Vulnerable road users suffer disproportionately from distraction. A momentary glance away can result in striking someone the driver never saw.
High-Speed Crashes
When distraction continues at highway speeds creates catastrophic outcomes.
Punitive Damages Considerations
Severe inattention can support punitive damages. Examples include:
- Texting on highways
- Phone use in protected zones
- Active video viewing
- Prior history of distracted driving incidents or citations
- Distraction combined with other factors (speeding, impairment, fatigue)
Building a Distracted Driving Case
Preserve Cell Phone Records Quickly
Phone records aren’t kept forever. Spoliation letters need to go out fast.
Preserve Social Media and App Data
Social media platforms have varying retention policies. Quick preservation demands can lock down data that would otherwise be lost.
Get the Police Report and Citations
Traffic charges provide critical case evidence.
Document Witness Observations
Witnesses who saw the driver on their phone carry credibility weight.
Vehicle Data Analysis
Vehicle electronics may contain evidence of distraction.
Damages Available
These claims can pursue:
- Past and future medical expenses
- Lost wages
- Reduced ability to work
- Property damage
- Pain and suffering
- Loss of consortium
- Punitive damages in cases involving egregious distraction conduct
Attorney Costs
Counsel in this area earn fees only on recovery. Case reviews cost nothing.
Move Quickly on the Digital Trail
Cell phone records, app data, and electronic evidence all have retention windows. Various data holders don’t preserve data forever. OK’s statute of limitations sets a hard cutoff. Getting an attorney involved promptly positions the claim for the recovery the evidence trail makes possible.