Compensation After a Distracted Driving Crash in McAlester, OK
Distracted driving has overtaken drunk driving as a leading cause of crashes in many categories. Distraction leaves a digital trail that drunk driving doesn’t. A McAlester car accident attorney knows how to find the digital fingerprints distraction leaves behind.
What Counts as Distracted Driving?
Distracted driving covers any activity that diverts attention from driving.
Three Types of Distraction
Distraction has three forms:
Visual Distraction
Visual distractions remove the driver’s gaze from traffic. Examples include reading text messages.
Manual Distraction
Manual distractions remove hands from steering. Examples include adjusting controls.
Cognitive Distraction
Mind-off-driving distractions. These include focusing on problems unrelated to driving.
Phone use simultaneously involves visual, manual, and cognitive distraction.
Common Distracted Driving Activities
- Texting and reading text messages
- Voice communication via phone
- Scrolling through feeds
- Reading or sending emails
- Watching videos
- Navigation app interaction
- Adjusting infotainment systems
- Consuming food or beverages
- Self-care tasks
- Print or screen reading
- Interacting with passengers (especially children or pets)
- Searching for items
- Smoking
- Driving while distracted by external concerns
- Mind wandering
Why Distracted Driving Cases Are Often Easier to Prove
The Digital Trail
Distraction creates a digital paper trail. Different from drunk driving (which requires testing), the digital age has created persistent evidence.
Cell Phone Records
Phone carrier data document phone use during relevant periods. This data is often case-defining.
Texting and App Records
Text message records are recoverable through legal process. Social media platform records may be retrievable from platform companies.
Vehicle Infotainment Data
Vehicle electronic systems track use. Vehicle interaction data may be recoverable.
Surveillance and Dashcam Evidence
Traffic cameras may document the driver’s actions at the wheel.
Witness Observations
Independent observers provide direct evidence of distraction.
Driver Admissions
Drivers sometimes admit distraction in police reports, statements, or social media posts provides direct proof.
The Legal Framework
OK Distracted Driving Laws
Several state laws govern this conduct. Texting while driving is prohibited in most states. Statutory breaches directly establish negligence.
Negligence Per Se
When the driver committed a violation of statutory law, the violation itself satisfies the duty-breach analysis. The jury or judge doesn’t need to decide whether the conduct was negligent.
General Negligence
Apart from any per se claim, distraction breaches the duty all drivers owe. Common-law negligence requires drivers to give their full attention to driving.
Common Insurance Defenses
“There’s No Proof My Driver Was Distracted”
This is the most common defense. Defeating this defense requires the digital evidence trail.
“The Crash Would Have Happened Anyway”
“The distraction didn’t matter”. Defense argues distraction didn’t actually cause the crash.
Analysis of how attention affects crash dynamics counters these defenses.
“Hands-Free Made It Safe”
“It was hands-free, so it was safe”.
Studies show hands-free phone use creates significant cognitive distraction. Phone use is dangerous regardless of how the phone is held.
“The Plaintiff Was Distracted Too”
Defense pushes shared-fault claims. OK’s comparative fault rules may reduce — but typically won’t eliminate — recovery.
Severity Patterns in Distracted Driving Crashes
Rear-End Collisions
Eyes-off-road distraction accounts for many rear-end wrecks. The driver doesn’t react in time.
Lane Departure Crashes
Cognitive and visual distraction causes lane departure crashes.
Failure-to-Yield Crashes
Visual distraction at intersections account for many failure-to-yield crashes.
Pedestrian and Cyclist Crashes
Distraction creates pedestrian and cyclist risk. A momentary glance away can result in striking someone the driver never saw.
High-Speed Crashes
Highway distraction results in particularly devastating wrecks.
Punitive Damages Considerations
Extreme distraction can support punitive damages. Examples include:
- High-speed texting
- Phone use in protected zones
- Active video viewing
- History of similar conduct
- Combined-conduct cases
Building a Distracted Driving Case
Preserve Cell Phone Records Quickly
Phone records aren’t kept forever. Subpoenas must be served promptly.
Preserve Social Media and App Data
Social media platforms have varying retention policies. Prompt legal action secure the digital trail.
Get the Police Report and Citations
Distracted driving citations may establish negligence per se.
Document Witness Observations
Bystander accounts of driver behavior carry credibility weight.
Vehicle Data Analysis
Onboard data may contain evidence of distraction.
Damages Available
Distracted driving accident damages parallel other auto claim categories:
- Past and future medical expenses
- Earnings affected by injury
- Permanent occupational limitations
- Property damage
- Pain and suffering
- Wrongful death and survivor damages
- Punitive damages in cases involving egregious distraction conduct
Attorney Costs
Distracted driver accident attorneys charge no upfront fees. Free initial consultations are standard.
Move Quickly on the Digital Trail
The digital trail isn’t kept indefinitely. Multiple data custodians don’t preserve data forever. Filing deadlines applies regardless. Contacting a McAlester distracted driver accident attorney quickly triggers the preservation steps that lock down digital evidence.