“Labor Omnia Vincit” McKay Law
Inadequate security claims are uniquely demanding from both legal and human perspectives in Midwest City, OK. When property owners fail to provide reasonable security and someone is assaulted, robbed, or killed, the legal path to justice involves proving what should have been prevented. McKay Law advocates for negligent security victims throughout OK. These cases are fundamentally different from typical premises liability claims—demonstrating that the attack was preventable with reasonable security measures. Inadequate security claims frequently arise from properties where owners cut corners on safety despite known risks. These cases can involve assaults and batteries in poorly lit parking lots, sexual assaults in apartment buildings with broken locks, shootings at venues with inadequate security personnel, robberies at businesses without cameras or alarms, and wrongful death from preventable attacks. Determining liability demands experienced legal work—under premises liability and negligence principles. Our Midwest City negligent security attorneys investigate every angle—police reports of prior crimes on or near the property, surveillance footage, security personnel records, maintenance logs for locks and lighting, witness statements, and property management communications. Negligent security cases often require security experts to establish the standard of care. Potential defendants include landlords, management firms, security contractors, and corporate entities responsible for safety. These claims involve coverage issues—making thorough investigation of all available insurance critical. Injuries from negligent security incidents gunshot wounds, traumatic brain injuries from beatings, sexual assault trauma, stab wounds, broken bones, severe psychological injuries including PTSD, and wrongful death. We recover all available damages including economic and non-economic losses from every responsible party. Defendants will try to blame only the criminal attacker—you need legal counsel experienced with premises liability litigation. All inadequate security claims is handled on a contingency fee basis—zero upfront cost. Contact McKay Law today for a complimentary evaluation with a Midwest City, OK inadequate security attorney who will pursue every responsible party.
Property owners have a legal duty to protect visitors from foreseeable criminal acts. When security failures lead to crime victimization, owners can be held responsible. These are negligent security cases. Negligent security cases involve apartment complexes, hotels, parking lots, shopping centers, bars, nightclubs, and other locations where poor security led to crime. McKay Law represents negligent security victims in Midwest City and in surrounding communities.
Whether security is “adequate” depends on the circumstances:
To win a negligent security case, foreseeability must be established. This can be shown through:
These cases have unique aspects:
Oklahoma generally gives 2 years from the date of the incident to file (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). Different rules may apply for sexual assault cases. For children, the deadline may be tolled until age 18.
We move quickly to secure surveillance video before it’s deleted, investigate crime statistics at the property and in the area, obtain prior complaints, retain security experts, work with criminal proceedings, protect client privacy in sensitive cases, partner with treating providers, and build each file for the courtroom from the start.
A: Yes, if the crime was foreseeable and security was inadequate.
A: Nothing upfront. We only get paid if we win.
A: Possibly — depends on foreseeability and security adequacy.
A: Hotel sexual assault cases support claims. Inadequate security, broken locks, untrained staff, or failure to address known dangers can all create liability.
A: The crime should have been predictable. Foreseeability is typically established through prior incidents, neighborhood crime, or specific threats.
A: File a wrongful death claim if the property owner was negligent.
A: Never. Refer them to your attorney.
A: Yes, if safety permits. Document anything you can.
A: 2 years from the date of the incident (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). For minors, the deadline may be tolled until age 18.
These cases combine premises liability with criminal conduct by third parties. The injury was caused by a criminal — but the case isn’t against the criminal. The defendant is the property owner whose security failures enabled the harm. This is its own area of law. A local attorney experienced with these claims knows the specific legal requirements these cases involve.
The central legal issue is whether property owners can be liable for criminal acts committed by third parties.
General rule: property owners generally aren’t liable for criminal acts of third parties.
Multiple exceptions apply.
The central legal concept in negligent security.
Property owners can be liable for criminal acts by third parties when foreseeability of the criminal act.
Foreseeability is typically established through prior similar criminal activity.
Certain relationships create elevated duties to provide security:
Previous criminal activity on the property provides the strongest foreseeability evidence.
Prior crime evidence should include:
Crime in the surrounding area can establish foreseeability when the property’s location demonstrates risk.
Area crime evidence sources include:
Evidence the owner knew about crime can establish foreseeability:
Property types with elevated risk:
Robberies at gas stations, ATMs, convenience stores, parking lots.
Assault incidents.
Sexual victimization.
These are among the most devastating negligent security cases.
Gun violence incidents create distinct case scenarios.
Mass casualty events can support negligent security claims.
Violence in apartment complexes generates significant case volume.
Lodging-related crime can support negligent security claims.
Parking lot and garage crime drives many cases.
Workplace crime cases.
Adequacy varies by property type.
Adequate security typically involves:
Proper lighting.
Insufficient lighting drives many security failures.
Operational camera coverage.
Adequate cameras require:
Security guards or personnel, particularly for high-risk properties.
Controls on access to the property.
Operational locking systems.
Emergency communications, including panic buttons.
Maintenance that addresses security.
Written security policies, Security training, Crisis protocols.
Insufficient lighting enables criminal activity.
Cameras that don’t work fail to provide evidence after crimes.
Insufficient personnel given the actual risk profile.
Property owners who received security assessments but failed to implement recommendations face heightened liability.
Locks that don’t work.
Inadequate training.
Disregarded complaints carry greater exposure.
Recoverable losses include include:
Initial emergency treatment, Operating costs, Hospital stays, Rehabilitation costs, Continuing care, Psychological care.
Past and future income loss and diminished earning capacity.
Pain and suffering damages.
Psychological consequences generate major damages.
Loss of enjoyment.
Spousal damages.
In fatal negligent security cases.
Negligent security cases frequently support punitive damages, especially where:
Owners are primary defendants.
Property managers carry liability.
Security contractors may bear primary responsibility for inadequate security.
Different parties may own and operate the property may share fault.
For franchised establishments (hotels, restaurants, etc.), franchisors may face liability in some circumstances.
Defense’s main argument.
“How could we have known?”. Documentation of prior crime defeats this defense.
“We had adequate security”.
Causation challenges.
“You contributed to your own harm”.
“The attacker did this, not us”. This argument generally fails because liability can rest on the property owner regardless of the criminal’s responsibility.
Insist on law enforcement involvement. Police reports are essential.
Quick medical attention protects the claim.
Comprehensive property documentation.
Specific security failures observed before, during, or after the incident.
Lighting conditions, camera locations, access controls, and security features.
Independent observers.
Crime statistics for the area and prior crime on the property can be researched.
Mental health care need professional attention.
Adjusters reach out fast. Direct insurer communication can permanently damage the case.
Negligent security attorneys work on contingency. Specialty expertise costs advanced by the firm.
These cases require quick action.
Camera evidence has limited retention.
Employee turnover requiring quick action.
Property owners may modify security, which can be used as evidence of inadequacy.
The legal time limit applies regardless.
Getting an attorney involved promptly positions the case for the substantial recovery these cases can produce when properly built.
When a shooting happens in a parking lot, hotel hallway, apartment complex, or store, the criminal is rarely the only one responsible. Property owners have a legal obligation to keep reasonable security for everyone they invite onto their premises — and when they ignore that duty, foreseeable crimes happen and innocent people get hurt. Negligent security claims arise when a property had a series of prior crimes that should have prompted action, when known hazards like broken locks, dead security cameras, burned-out parking lot lights, missing security personnel, and unsecured access points were left unaddressed, and when reasonable measures — proper lighting, working surveillance, trained guards, access controls — would have stopped the attack. At McKay Law, we take on these cases by examining the property’s crime history, prior complaints to management, security audits, police call records, and the owner’s response — or non-response — to known risks. We partner with security experts, crime prevention specialists, and former law enforcement to demonstrate exactly what a reasonable owner would have done and why this owner didn’t measure up.
Apartment complexes, hotels, parking garages, shopping centers, bars and nightclubs, ATMs, gas stations, college campuses, and event venues all carry substantial legal responsibility for the safety of the people they invite onto their property. When you partner with the McKay Law family, we fight for compensation that reflects the full scope of what was taken from you — physical and emotional. We demand complete compensation for emergency care, surgeries, hospitalization, ongoing rehabilitation, future medical needs, prescription costs, counseling and psychiatric care for trauma and PTSD, lost wages, reduced future income, the profound fear, anxiety, and emotional aftermath of being assaulted in a place that was supposed to be safe — and in the most tragic cases, the wrongful death of a loved one. Reach us now at (866) 679-9651 or get in touch online to set up your free, confidential consultation and get a firm that treats crimes against innocent victims with the weight they deserve fighting for you.
See why so many others choose McKay Law, PLLC
With over 300 five-star reviews, McKay Law, your local Personal Injury Law Firm has earned the trust and gratitude of our clients. Every case we handle is unique, and every client’s story matters. Don’t just take our word for it—hear directly from our clients about their experiences and why they confidently recommend us to others.
