Recovering Damages From a Drugged Driver Wreck in Moore, OK
Drug-impaired driving now equals or exceeds alcohol-impaired driving in many fatal crash statistics. Drug-impaired driving claims face challenges DUI cases don’t. Defense strategies leverage these complications. A local attorney experienced with drug-impaired driving claims knows how to overcome the proof challenges.
Drugged Driving Isn’t Just Illegal Drugs
The widespread misunderstanding is that drugged driving requires drugs of abuse. That’s incorrect.
Prescription Medications
Many prescription medications impair driving. Examples include:
- Pain medications
- Benzodiazepines (Xanax, Valium, Ativan, Klonopin)
- Sleep medications (Ambien, Lunesta, Sonata)
- Skeletal muscle relaxers
- Mental health prescriptions
- Sedating allergy treatments
- Stimulant medications
- Migraine medications
- Seizure prevention drugs
Over-the-Counter Medications
Non-prescription medications can be drugged driving substances:
- Diphenhydramine (Benadryl)
- DXM-containing medications
- OTC sleep medications
- Motion sickness medications
Recreational Drugs
Illicit substances include cannabis products in any form, cocaine, amphetamines, recreational opioid use, psychedelics, synthetic substances, ketamine and PCP, and nitrous oxide and other inhalants.
Why Drugged Driving Cases Are Harder to Prove Than DUI Cases
No Equivalent of the .08 BAC Standard
Alcohol has a per se threshold. Drug impairment lacks comparable per se thresholds. Some jurisdictions have THC per se limits, but those limits don’t necessarily correlate with actual impairment.
For non-alcohol substances generally, the case requires showing the driver was actually impaired.
Detection Difficulties
Drug testing can identify substances, but detection of presence doesn’t equal proof of impairment.
THC metabolites persist long after impairment subsides. This creates significant scientific and legal challenges.
Other drugs have varying detection windows. Some drugs disappear quickly, others persist for days.
Testing Isn’t Routine
Breath testing for alcohol is standard. Drug testing isn’t always conducted. Where testing wasn’t conducted, impairment must be established through other means.
Drug Recognition Experts (DREs)
Specially trained officers called Drug Recognition Experts can identify drug impairment through systematic evaluation. DRE evaluations support drug impairment findings when conducted. DRE coverage isn’t universal.
Defense Challenges
Drug impairment cases face vigorous defense:
- “Detected metabolites prove drugs were used at some point, not that the driver was impaired”
- Testing methodology challenges
- “Doctor-prescribed medication”
- “There’s no proof of impairment at the actual time of driving”
How These Cases Get Built
Toxicology Evidence
Where testing was conducted, lab results are key evidence.
However, the analysis needs expert interpretation. Forensic toxicology experts interpret the results in context.
Observable Impairment
Driver behavior at the scene are often case-defining.
These markers include:
- Impaired speech patterns
- Glassy or bloodshot eyes
- Physical coordination problems
- Unusual presentations
- Loss of consciousness
- Pre-crash driving behavior
- Failure of field sobriety tests
- Physical impairment markers
Pre-Crash Driving Behavior
Eyewitness reports of driving help establish impairment. Documented driving behavior provide circumstantial evidence.
Criminal Charges
Driver’s criminal liability can substantially support the civil case. Adjudicated criminal cases carry significant weight in subsequent civil litigation.
Driver Statements and Admissions
Statements to police provide direct proof.
Medical Records
Medical history may reveal prescription medications, drug abuse history, or related medical context.
Vehicle Evidence
Drugs, paraphernalia, or related materials in the vehicle support drug-impairment claims.
Punitive Damages and Drugged Driving
These cases often involve egregious conduct supporting punitive damages. Choosing to drive while drug-impaired typically supports gross negligence findings.
Punitive damages can substantially increase recovery in serious drugged driving cases.
Common Insurance Defenses
“There’s No Proof of Impairment”
The defining defense. Presence-without-impairment defense.
“The Medication Was Taken as Prescribed”
For prescription drug cases, “Doctor-prescribed and taken correctly”. Following a prescription doesn’t preclude impairment-based liability. Compliance with prescription doesn’t mean safe driving.
“Comparative Fault”
“You contributed too”.
“The Crash Wasn’t Caused by Drug Impairment”
“Drugs didn’t cause the crash”. Forensic analysis of impairment-crash connection defeats causation challenges.
Critical Steps After a Drugged Driving Crash
Get the Police Report
Get the official report. Note DRE evaluation findings.
Document Witness Observations
People who saw the impaired driver before or at the scene can establish impairment when toxicology is unavailable.
Preserve the Vehicle Evidence
Items found in the other driver’s vehicle can build the impairment case.
Document Driver Statements
Anything the other driver said at the scene.
Photograph the Scene
Comprehensive scene documentation.
Get Medical Attention Immediately
Same-day medical care protects against later disputes.
Track the Criminal Case
Criminal charges against the other driver provides important evidence.
Don’t Wait to Get Legal Help
These cases involve time-sensitive evidence.
Damages Available
These claims can pursue the typical categories plus enhanced damages:
- Comprehensive medical care
- Past and future income loss
- Permanent occupational limitations
- Vehicle repair or replacement
- Loss of enjoyment of life
- Compensation for fatal crashes
- Enhanced damages — particularly meaningful in these claims
Dram Shop and Third-Party Liability
In some cases involving prescription drugs, additional defendants may exist. Healthcare providers who prescribed medications without adequate warnings about driving can implicate the prescribing physician.
Attorney Costs
Drugged driving accident attorneys work on contingency. First meetings carry no charge. These cases require investment in toxicology experts and forensic specialists fronted by counsel.
Move Quickly
Drug evidence has time-sensitive preservation issues. Scene evidence is lost. OK’s statute of limitations sets a hard cutoff. Engaging counsel right away positions the claim for the full recovery these cases can produce.