“Labor Omnia Vincit” McKay Law
Inadequate security claims are among the most complex and emotionally difficult types of personal injury cases in Moore, OK. When inadequate security measures lead to criminal attacks on innocent victims, liability extends beyond just the criminal attacker. McKay Law represents negligent security victims throughout OK. Negligent security cases present unique challenges—proving foreseeability, establishing the property owner’s duty, and connecting security failures to the criminal act. Common locations for negligent security incidents include residential properties, commercial businesses, hospitality venues, and public gathering places. These cases can involve violent attacks, sexual assaults, robberies, and homicides on unsecured properties. Determining liability takes specialized expertise—with foreseeability being the central legal question. Our Moore premises liability attorneys investigate every angle—crime statistics, security audits, employee testimony, and physical evidence from the scene. Complex premises claims demand expert analysis to establish the standard of care. Liable parties may include property owners, property management companies, security companies hired to protect the premises, business operators and tenants, hotel and motel franchises, and parent corporations that set security policies. Insurance complications are common—multiple policies may apply, including general liability and umbrella coverage, and insurers aggressively defend these claims. Injuries from negligent security incidents gunshot wounds, traumatic brain injuries from beatings, sexual assault trauma, stab wounds, broken bones, severe psychological injuries including PTSD, and wrongful death. We fight for every dollar including economic and non-economic losses from every responsible party. The other side will argue the attack was unforeseeable—you deserve representation that understands how to win these challenging cases. Every negligent security case is handled on a contingency fee basis—you pay nothing unless we win. Reach out to McKay Law right away for a free consultation with a Moore, OK premises liability attorney who will identify all sources of compensation.
Property owners must take reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable crime. When poor security results in customer or visitor injuries, legal liability can follow. These claims are called negligent security claims. Common locations include apartments, hotels, parking lots, malls, and bars where inadequate security created the conditions for crime. McKay Law represents negligent security victims in Moore and across the state.
Whether security is “adequate” depends on the circumstances:
For these cases to succeed, foreseeability must be established. This can be shown through:
These cases have unique aspects:
Oklahoma generally gives 2 years from the date of the incident to file (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). Different rules may apply for sexual assault cases. For minor victims, the deadline may be tolled until age 18.
We move quickly to secure surveillance video before it’s deleted, examine crime data, secure history of incidents, retain security experts, coordinate with criminal cases when appropriate, handle privacy concerns, partner with treating providers, and build each file for the courtroom from the start.
A: Likely yes if you can establish foreseeability and security failures.
A: Nothing upfront. No recovery, no fee.
A: Possibly — depends on foreseeability and security adequacy.
A: Hotels can be liable for sexual assault. Multiple security failures often create liability.
A: The crime should have been predictable. Foreseeability is typically established through prior incidents, neighborhood crime, or specific threats.
A: File a wrongful death claim if the property owner was negligent.
A: No. Talk to a lawyer first.
A: Yes, if safety permits. Visual evidence of inadequate security is important.
A: 2 years from the date of the incident (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). For minors, the deadline may be tolled until age 18.
These cases combine premises liability with criminal conduct by third parties. The case targets the property owner, not the attacker. The property owner who created the conditions allowing the attack is the defendant. These cases operate under specific legal doctrines. A local attorney experienced with these claims brings expertise in this specialized corner of premises liability.
The defining legal question asks whether owners are responsible for third-party crime.
General rule: property owners generally aren’t liable for criminal acts of third parties.
Multiple exceptions apply.
This is the foundational doctrine.
Owner liability attaches when foreseeability of the criminal act.
Foreseeability is shown through prior similar criminal activity.
Special relationships impose stronger duties regarding security:
Prior crime on the property establishes foreseeability directly.
Evidence of prior crimes should include:
Neighborhood crime data can establish foreseeability when the property is in a high-crime area.
Sources for area crime data include:
Owner knowledge of crime risk can establish foreseeability:
Property types with elevated risk:
Robbery incidents.
Physical assault in parking lots, garages, building common areas.
Sexual victimization.
These cases produce particularly significant damages.
Shooting cases present specific challenges.
Mass shooting events may create negligent security liability.
Apartment-related crime drives many cases.
Hotel crime can support negligent security claims.
Parking facility crime drives many cases.
Workplace crime cases.
Adequate security depends on the property and the specific risk profile.
Elements of adequate security typically include:
Adequate exterior and interior lighting.
Poor lighting drives many security failures.
Functional surveillance camera systems.
Adequate cameras require:
Security guards or personnel, particularly for high-risk properties.
Entry restrictions.
Working locks.
Working emergency communication systems, including emergency phones.
Landscaping that doesn’t create concealment opportunities.
Documented policies, Security training, Response procedures.
Inadequate lighting enables criminal activity.
Cameras that don’t work don’t deter crime.
Insufficient personnel given the actual risk profile.
Implementation failures carry greater exposure.
Locks that don’t work.
Inadequate training.
Disregarded complaints face heightened liability.
Compensation in these cases include:
Emergency and trauma care, surgical costs, hospitalization, Rehabilitation costs, Continuing care, Mental health damages.
Lost wages and reduced earning ability.
Physical pain and suffering.
PTSD is common after negligent security incidents drive significant damages.
Daily life impacts.
Effects on intimate relationships.
In fatal negligent security cases.
Exemplary damages are particularly common, especially where:
The property owner is the primary defendant.
Property management companies may share fault.
Security contractors can face direct liability for service deficiencies.
Different parties may own and operate the property carry shared liability.
For franchised establishments (hotels, restaurants, etc.), franchisors may face liability in some circumstances.
The fundamental defense.
Foreseeability challenges. Documentation of prior crime defeats this defense.
“We had adequate security”.
Causation challenges.
Comparative fault arguments.
“The attacker did this, not us”. This defense generally fails.
Make sure police are called. Police reports are essential.
Prompt medical evaluation is essential.
Comprehensive property documentation.
Specific security failures observed before, during, or after the incident.
Lighting conditions, camera locations, access controls, and security features.
Other people at the property.
Prior crime evidence require investigation.
PTSD and other psychological consequences need professional attention.
Insurance company representatives. Recorded statements before legal advice create problematic admissions.
Counsel handling these cases work on contingency. Specialty expertise costs advanced by the firm.
These cases require quick action.
Surveillance footage has limited retention.
Security personnel may leave employment making them harder to locate.
Property owners may modify security, though such changes don’t typically establish liability directly.
The legal time limit applies regardless.
Engaging counsel right away locks down the critical evidence.
When a shooting happens in a parking lot, hotel hallway, apartment complex, or store, the criminal is rarely the only one responsible. Property owners have a duty of care to put in place reasonable security for everyone they invite onto their premises — and when they disregard that duty, foreseeable crimes happen and innocent people get hurt. Negligent security claims arise when a property had a track record of prior crimes that should have prompted action, when known hazards like broken locks, dead security cameras, burned-out parking lot lights, missing security personnel, and unsecured access points were never fixed, and when reasonable measures — proper lighting, working surveillance, trained guards, access controls — would have prevented the attack. At McKay Law, we manage these cases by digging into the property’s crime history, prior complaints to management, security audits, police call records, and the owner’s response — or non-response — to known risks. We retain security experts, crime prevention specialists, and former law enforcement to prove exactly what a reasonable owner would have done and why this owner came up short.
Apartment complexes, hotels, parking garages, shopping centers, bars and nightclubs, ATMs, gas stations, college campuses, and event venues all carry major legal responsibility for the safety of the people they invite onto their property. When you come into the McKay Law family, we pursue compensation that conveys the full scope of what was taken from you — physical and emotional. We fight for complete compensation for emergency care, surgeries, hospitalization, ongoing rehabilitation, future medical needs, prescription costs, counseling and psychiatric care for trauma and PTSD, missed paychecks, reduced future income, the deep fear, anxiety, and emotional aftermath of being assaulted in a place that was supposed to be safe — and in the most sorrowful cases, the wrongful death of a precious life. Phone us right away at (866) 679-9651 or reach out online to set up your free, confidential consultation and place a firm that regards crimes against innocent victims with the gravity they deserve on your side.
See why so many others choose McKay Law, PLLC
With over 300 five-star reviews, McKay Law, your local Personal Injury Law Firm has earned the trust and gratitude of our clients. Every case we handle is unique, and every client’s story matters. Don’t just take our word for it—hear directly from our clients about their experiences and why they confidently recommend us to others.
