“Labor Omnia Vincit” McKay Law
Driver distraction causes preventable crashes daily in Oklahoma City, OK. When someone chooses to text or multitask while driving, they put everyone else at risk. McKay Law advocates for victims of distracted driver crashes throughout OK. A driver glancing at a text can travel hundreds of feet without seeing the road—which is why these crashes tend to be catastrophic. These crashes typically involve texting, social media, navigation distractions, and visual or cognitive distractions. Texas prohibits reading or sending texts behind the wheel—and proving the violation supports your case. Our Oklahoma City texting while driving accident lawyers establish driver inattention with evidence. We act quickly—electronic data, third-party testimony, and law enforcement findings. Subpoenaed phone data can prove distraction—establishing the driver was on the phone at impact. Injuries from distracted driving crashes traumatic brain injuries, spinal damage, broken bones, internal injuries, and wrongful death. We pursue full compensation including hospital costs, ongoing treatment, lost income, suffering, and survivor damages. When inattention rises to recklessness, punitive damages may apply. Every client we represent is handled on a no-win, no-fee basis—no fees unless we recover. Don’t wait—phone records can be erased and electronic evidence lost. Reach out to McKay Law right away for a free consultation with a Oklahoma City, OK distracted driving accident lawyer who will pursue every dollar your case is worth.
Distracted driving kills and injures thousands every year. Texting, calls, navigation, eating, and other distractions prevent drivers from paying full attention to the road. Just seconds of inattention can cause catastrophic wrecks. McKay Law advocates for distracted driving accident victims in Oklahoma City and in surrounding communities.
Safety researchers identify three main types of distraction:
Texting is the worst because it involves all three types of distraction.
Oklahoma law specifically addresses distracted driving:
Violations of these laws can establish negligence per se in personal injury cases.
Oklahoma follows modified comparative fault (Okla. Stat. tit. 23, § 13). Recovery is available if your share stays at 50% or below, with your award reduced by your percentage of fault.
Oklahoma allows punitive damages in cases of reckless or willful conduct. Situations supporting punitive awards include:
Oklahoma generally gives two years from the date of the crash to file (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). Quick action is critical because electronic evidence vanishes.
We move quickly to lock down phone data before it’s lost, preserve onboard computer data, engage crash reconstruction specialists, build the distraction evidence, pursue punitive damages where conduct warrants, and prepare every case as if it will go to trial.
A: Multiple evidence sources — phone records, vehicle data, witnesses, and video.
A: Nothing upfront. No fee unless we recover.
A: Yes. It’s powerful proof of liability.
A: Through litigation, we can subpoena them.
A: Don’t. Call us first.
A: In some cases, yes. Texting, video watching, and other egregious distractions can justify punitive damages.
A: Two years from the date of the crash (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). Don’t wait — phone data has retention limits.
Distraction now rivals impairment as the top crash factor. It’s also one of the most proveable forms of negligence. A local attorney experienced with distraction-related crashes knows how to find the digital fingerprints distraction leaves behind.
“Distraction” includes any task taking the driver’s focus off the road.
There are three recognized types of distraction:
Eyes-off-road distractions. This category covers looking at phones.
Manual distractions remove hands from steering. These include holding phones.
Anything that takes the driver’s mind off driving. These include conversations.
Phone use simultaneously involves visual, manual, and cognitive distraction.
Distracted driving leaves evidence. Unlike many other driver behaviors, the digital age has created persistent evidence.
Subpoenaed cell phone records reveal phone activity at the time of the crash. This evidence is typically definitive.
Text message records are recoverable through legal process. Application usage logs are subject to subpoena.
Infotainment systems log user activity. All vehicle system interactions may be available through vehicle forensics.
Traffic cameras may capture distracted driving behaviors.
Witness statements provide direct evidence of distraction.
Drivers sometimes admit distraction in police reports, statements, or social media posts becomes powerful evidence.
The state has specific anti-distraction statutes. Hand-held phone use is typically restricted. Violations of these laws provide a foundation for liability.
If the driver broke a statute, the violation itself satisfies the duty-breach analysis. The jury or judge doesn’t need to decide whether the conduct was negligent.
Beyond statutory violations, distracted driving is straightforward negligence. The reasonable person standard requires drivers to give their full attention to driving.
This is the most common defense. Defeating this defense requires the digital evidence trail.
Causation defense. Defense argues distraction didn’t actually cause the crash.
Analysis of how attention affects crash dynamics defeats causation challenges.
Defense pushes hands-free legitimacy.
Studies show hands-free phone use creates significant cognitive distraction. Cognitive distraction from hands-free use is substantial.
Defense pushes shared-fault claims. The state’s comparative negligence framework may reduce — but typically won’t eliminate — recovery.
Visual distraction is the leading cause of rear-end crashes. The driver doesn’t react in time.
Attention-lapse crashes causes lane departure crashes.
Visual distraction at intersections drive intersection collisions.
Vulnerable road users suffer disproportionately from distraction. Distraction-pedestrian crashes are often catastrophic.
High-speed inattention creates catastrophic outcomes.
Egregious distracted driving conduct can support punitive damages. Conduct supporting punitive damages includes:
Cell phone records typically have retention windows. Spoliation letters need to go out fast.
Digital evidence has unpredictable retention. Immediate preservation letters protect evidence.
Distracted driving citations may establish negligence per se.
Independent observations can be decisive evidence.
Modern vehicles’ infotainment systems and other electronic systems may show what the driver was doing.
Recoverable losses include:
Distracted driver accident attorneys earn fees only on recovery. Free initial consultations are standard.
Cell phone records, app data, and electronic evidence all have retention windows. Multiple data custodians may delete records after defined periods. The legal time limit continues running. Getting an attorney involved promptly positions the claim for the recovery the evidence trail makes possible.
A driver who looks down at a phone for just five seconds while traveling 55 miles per hour moves across the length of a football field with their eyes off the road. That’s the math behind distracted driving — and it’s why texting, scrolling social media, fiddling with infotainment screens, eating behind the wheel, applying makeup, and reaching for items in the back seat cause thousands of preventable crashes every single day. At McKay Law, we know that proving distraction is often the difference between a fair settlement and a lowball offer. We secure cell phone records, social media activity, app usage logs, and infotainment system data to confirm exactly what the at-fault driver was doing in the seconds before impact. We combine that evidence with dash cam and surveillance footage, witness statements, and police reports to build a case the insurance company can’t talk its way out of.
Distracted drivers cause some of the most preventable crashes on the road — rear-end collisions in stopped traffic, lane-departure wrecks at highway speed, and intersection crashes from drivers who blew through a red light because their eyes were on a screen. The injuries that follow are anything but minor: spinal damage, traumatic brain injuries, multiple fractures, and lifelong complications. When you come into the McKay Law family, we push back against the at-fault driver’s attempts to downplay what they did. We pursue full compensation for emergency care, surgeries, hospitalization, ongoing rehabilitation, future medical needs, prescription costs, lost income, lost earning capacity, vehicle replacement, and the pain, frustration, and lasting impact of a crash that never had to happen. Reach us without waiting at (866) 679-9651 or reach out online to schedule your free consultation and bring a firm that knows how to expose distracted driving behind you.
See why so many others choose McKay Law, PLLC
With over 300 five-star reviews, McKay Law, your local Personal Injury Law Firm has earned the trust and gratitude of our clients. Every case we handle is unique, and every client’s story matters. Don’t just take our word for it—hear directly from our clients about their experiences and why they confidently recommend us to others.
