“Labor Omnia Vincit” McKay Law
Premises liability cases involving criminal attacks are particularly challenging and sensitive in Piedmont, OK. When property owners fail to provide reasonable security and someone is assaulted, robbed, or killed, liability extends beyond just the criminal attacker. McKay Law represents negligent security victims throughout OK. Negligent security cases present unique challenges—proving foreseeability, establishing the property owner’s duty, and connecting security failures to the criminal act. These crimes typically occur at apartment complexes with broken gates or poor lighting, parking lots and garages, hotels and motels, bars and nightclubs, shopping centers and malls, gas stations and convenience stores, and college campuses. These cases can involve violent attacks, sexual assaults, robberies, and homicides on unsecured properties. Determining liability requires thorough investigation—often involving review of prior crime history, security policies, and industry standards. Our Piedmont negligent security attorneys move fast to preserve evidence—police reports of prior crimes on or near the property, surveillance footage, security personnel records, maintenance logs for locks and lighting, witness statements, and property management communications. Negligent security cases often require security experts to identify what reasonable security would have included. We pursue claims against landlords, management firms, security contractors, and corporate entities responsible for safety. These claims involve coverage issues—multiple policies may apply, including general liability and umbrella coverage, and insurers aggressively defend these claims. Injuries from negligent security incidents life-altering harm—both physical wounds and profound psychological impact. We pursue full compensation including hospital costs, ongoing therapy, missed income, suffering, and survivor damages. Defendants will try to blame only the criminal attacker—you need an attorney who can prove foreseeability and connect the security failures to your injuries. Every client we represent is handled on a no-win, no-fee basis—no fees unless we recover. Reach out to McKay Law right away for a free consultation with a Piedmont, OK negligent security lawyer who will identify all sources of compensation.
Property owners have a legal duty to protect visitors from foreseeable criminal acts. When poor security results in customer or visitor injuries, owners can be held responsible. This is called negligent security. Common locations include apartments, hotels, parking lots, malls, and bars where inadequate lighting, broken locks, insufficient cameras, lack of security personnel, or known crime risks lead to violence. McKay Law represents negligent security victims in Piedmont and across the state.
Security must be reasonable under the circumstances:
To win a negligent security case, the crime must have been foreseeable. This can be shown through:
These cases have unique aspects:
You typically have two years from the date of the incident to file (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). Different rules may apply for sexual assault cases. For child victims, the limitations period may extend.
We get to work immediately to secure surveillance video before it’s deleted, investigate crime statistics at the property and in the area, pull prior complaints and incident reports, retain security experts, coordinate civil and criminal cases, trauma-informed representation, partner with treating providers, and treat each matter as trial-ready.
A: Yes, if the crime was foreseeable and security was inadequate.
A: Nothing. No fee unless we recover.
A: Yes, in qualifying cases.
A: Hotels can be liable for sexual assault. Inadequate security, broken locks, untrained staff, or failure to address known dangers can all create liability.
A: Reasonably predictable. Foreseeability is typically established through prior incidents, neighborhood crime, or specific threats.
A: Wrongful death cases are available for negligent security deaths.
A: Never. Talk to a lawyer first.
A: Yes, in any way you can. Document anything you can.
A: 2 years from the date of the incident (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). Don’t wait — evidence and surveillance video disappear quickly.
Negligent security cases sit at the intersection of premises liability and third-party criminal conduct. The injury was caused by a criminal — but the case isn’t against the criminal. The defendant is the property owner whose security failures enabled the harm. This is its own area of law. A Piedmont negligent security attorney builds these cases around the actual legal framework.
The central legal issue asks whether owners are responsible for third-party crime.
General rule: property owners generally aren’t liable for criminal acts of third parties.
But several theories create exceptions.
Foreseeability is the central concept.
Property owners can be liable for criminal acts by third parties when the criminal act was foreseeable.
Foreseeability requires prior crime evidence.
Certain relationships create elevated duties for security:
Prior crime on the property provides the strongest foreseeability evidence.
Documentation of prior incidents should include:
Area crime statistics can establish foreseeability when the surrounding area has documented crime.
Sources for area crime data include:
Direct evidence of the property owner’s awareness can establish foreseeability:
Some properties have inherently elevated security risks:
Robberies at gas stations, ATMs, convenience stores, parking lots.
Assault incidents.
Sexual assault cases.
These are among the most devastating negligent security cases.
Gun violence incidents create distinct case scenarios.
Mass casualty events may create negligent security liability.
Violence in apartment complexes is a major negligent security category.
Hotel crime can support negligent security claims.
Parking-related crime generates significant case volume.
Workplace crime cases.
Security needs are property-specific.
Adequate security typically involves:
Lighting infrastructure.
Insufficient lighting drives many security failures.
Functional surveillance camera systems.
Cameras must be:
On-site security, particularly for high-risk properties.
Access controls.
Functional locks on doors, gates, and access points.
Emergency communications, including cellular signal in parking garages.
Landscaping that doesn’t create concealment opportunities.
Written security policies, Security training, Crisis protocols.
Insufficient lighting for criminals.
Cameras that don’t work fail to provide evidence after crimes.
Insufficient security staff for the property’s risk level.
Implementation failures may face punitive damages.
Inadequate access control systems.
Untrained security personnel.
Property owners who received complaints about crime but failed to respond carry greater exposure.
Negligent security damages can be substantial include:
Trauma center care, Surgery expenses, Inpatient care, Physical and other rehabilitation, Continuing care, mental health treatment (often substantial).
Past and future income loss and diminished earning capacity.
Pain damages.
Mental health damages generate major damages.
Effects on daily life and activities.
Spousal damages.
In fatal negligent security cases.
Exemplary damages are particularly common, especially where:
The property owner is the primary defendant.
Management firms can share liability.
Security service providers can face direct liability for security service failures.
Multiple property-related parties can share liability.
Franchise operators, brand owners may share fault.
The fundamental defense.
“How could we have known?”. Comprehensive prior-crime evidence defeats this defense.
“We had adequate security”.
Causation challenges.
Plaintiff conduct defenses.
Sole-criminal-responsibility arguments. This defense generally fails.
Don’t accept informal handling. Crime reports are critical.
Same-day medical care matters significantly.
Property-related details.
Specific security failures observed before, during, or after the incident.
Visual evidence of every relevant detail.
Bystanders.
Prior crime evidence should be gathered.
Psychological treatment often require significant treatment.
Property owner insurers contact quickly. Statements without counsel hurt the claim.
Lawyers experienced with negligent security earn fees only on recovery. Specialty expertise costs advanced by the firm.
Evidence has preservation windows.
Video recordings gets overwritten quickly.
Security personnel may leave employment requiring quick action.
Property owners often change security after incidents, which can be used as evidence of inadequacy.
OK’s statute of limitations continues running.
Getting an attorney involved promptly locks down the critical evidence.
When a assault happens in a parking lot, hotel hallway, apartment complex, or store, the criminal is rarely the only one responsible. Property owners have a responsibility to put in place reasonable security for everyone they invite onto their premises — and when they ignore that duty, foreseeable crimes happen and innocent people get hurt. Negligent security claims arise when a property had a series of prior crimes that should have prompted action, when known hazards like broken locks, dead security cameras, burned-out parking lot lights, missing security personnel, and unsecured access points were ignored, and when reasonable measures — proper lighting, working surveillance, trained guards, access controls — would have prevented the attack. At McKay Law, we take on these cases by investigating the property’s crime history, prior complaints to management, security audits, police call records, and the owner’s response — or non-response — to known risks. We consult security experts, crime prevention specialists, and former law enforcement to prove exactly what a reasonable owner would have done and why this owner came up short.
Apartment complexes, hotels, parking garages, shopping centers, bars and nightclubs, ATMs, gas stations, college campuses, and event venues all carry major legal responsibility for the safety of the people they invite onto their property. When you become part of the McKay Law family, we chase compensation that reflects the full scope of what was taken from you — physical and emotional. We pursue maximum compensation for emergency care, surgeries, hospitalization, ongoing rehabilitation, future medical needs, prescription costs, counseling and psychiatric care for trauma and PTSD, lost income, loss of livelihood, the enduring fear, anxiety, and emotional aftermath of being assaulted in a place that was supposed to be safe — and in the most heartbreaking cases, the wrongful death of a loved one. Contact us without waiting at (866) 679-9651 or get in touch online to set up your free, confidential consultation and bring a firm that treats crimes against innocent victims with the seriousness they deserve on your side.
See why so many others choose McKay Law, PLLC
With over 300 five-star reviews, McKay Law, your local Personal Injury Law Firm has earned the trust and gratitude of our clients. Every case we handle is unique, and every client’s story matters. Don’t just take our word for it—hear directly from our clients about their experiences and why they confidently recommend us to others.
