“Labor Omnia Vincit” McKay Law
Inadequate security claims are particularly challenging and sensitive in Sapulpa, OK. When property owners fail to provide reasonable security and someone is assaulted, robbed, or killed, holding the property owner accountable becomes critical. McKay Law fights for negligent security victims throughout OK. Inadequate security claims involve complexities beyond ordinary slip-and-fall matters—demonstrating that the attack was preventable with reasonable security measures. Common locations for negligent security incidents include apartment complexes with broken gates or poor lighting, parking lots and garages, hotels and motels, bars and nightclubs, shopping centers and malls, gas stations and convenience stores, and college campuses. Common types of incidents include assaults and batteries in poorly lit parking lots, sexual assaults in apartment buildings with broken locks, shootings at venues with inadequate security personnel, robberies at businesses without cameras or alarms, and wrongful death from preventable attacks. Determining liability requires thorough investigation—with foreseeability being the central legal question. Our Sapulpa negligent security attorneys act quickly to secure proof—crime statistics, security audits, employee testimony, and physical evidence from the scene. Complex premises claims demand expert analysis to identify what reasonable security would have included. Potential defendants include landlords, management firms, security contractors, and corporate entities responsible for safety. Negligent security cases raise complex insurance questions—making thorough investigation of all available insurance critical. Common harm includes catastrophic physical injuries, lasting emotional trauma, and fatalities. We fight for every dollar including medical bills, mental health treatment, lost wages, lost earning capacity, pain and suffering, emotional distress, and wrongful death damages. The other side will argue the attack was unforeseeable—you deserve representation that understands how to win these challenging cases. All inadequate security claims is handled on a contingency fee basis—zero upfront cost. Reach out to McKay Law right away for a free consultation with a Sapulpa, OK premises liability attorney who will identify all sources of compensation.
Property owners have a legal duty to protect visitors from foreseeable criminal acts. When inadequate security leads to assaults, robberies, or other criminal acts that injure visitors, the property owner can be held liable. These are negligent security cases. Negligent security cases involve apartment complexes, hotels, parking lots, shopping centers, bars, nightclubs, and other locations where inadequate security created the conditions for crime. Our firm fights for negligent security victims in Sapulpa and across the state.
Whether security is “adequate” depends on the circumstances:
To prove a negligent security case, the crime must have been foreseeable. Foreseeability is proven by:
These cases have unique aspects:
Oklahoma generally gives two years from the date of the incident to file (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). Sexual assault statutes may extend deadlines. For child victims, the deadline may be tolled until age 18.
We act fast to secure surveillance video before it’s deleted, investigate crime statistics at the property and in the area, secure history of incidents, bring in qualified security experts, coordinate with criminal cases when appropriate, protect client privacy in sensitive cases, coordinate with treating physicians and mental health professionals, and build each file for the courtroom from the start.
A: Possibly — depends on foreseeability and security failures.
A: Nothing upfront. No fee unless we recover.
A: Possibly — depends on foreseeability and security adequacy.
A: Hotels can be liable for sexual assault. Multiple security failures often create liability.
A: The crime was reasonably foreseeable. Foreseeability is shown through evidence of prior crime.
A: File a wrongful death claim if the property owner was negligent.
A: Never. Call us first.
A: Yes — when possible. Document anything you can.
A: 2 years from the date of the incident (Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 95). Sexual assault cases may have different deadlines.
These cases combine premises liability with criminal conduct by third parties. The injury was caused by a criminal — but the case isn’t against the criminal. The case is against the property owner who failed to provide adequate security. This is its own area of law. A local attorney experienced with these claims knows the specific legal requirements these cases involve.
The core question in negligent security is whether property owners can be liable for criminal acts committed by third parties.
General rule: property owners generally aren’t liable for criminal acts of third parties.
Multiple exceptions apply.
The central legal concept in negligent security.
Owner liability attaches when foreseeability of the criminal act.
Foreseeability requires prior similar criminal activity.
Some relationships create heightened duties regarding security:
Previous criminal activity on the property is the most powerful foreseeability evidence.
Evidence of prior crimes should include:
Crime in the surrounding area can establish foreseeability when the property is in a high-crime area.
Area crime evidence sources include:
Owner knowledge of crime risk can establish foreseeability:
Property types with elevated risk:
Robbery incidents.
Physical assault cases.
Sexual assault in hotels, apartment complexes, garages, and other premises.
These are among the most devastating negligent security cases.
Shooting cases present specific challenges.
Mass shooting events may create negligent security liability.
Violence in apartment complexes generates significant case volume.
Hotel crime can support negligent security claims.
Parking-related crime is a recurring case category.
Workplace crime cases.
Security needs are property-specific.
Elements of adequate security typically include:
Adequate exterior and interior lighting.
Insufficient lighting is a frequent contributing cause.
Working camera systems.
Cameras must be:
Security staff, particularly for risk-elevated properties.
Access controls.
Functional locks on doors, gates, and access points.
Working emergency communication systems, including panic buttons.
Proper landscaping.
Written security policies, Security training, Crisis protocols.
Inadequate lighting enables criminal activity.
Non-functional cameras don’t deter crime.
Insufficient security staff considering risk.
Implementation failures carry greater exposure.
Locks that don’t work.
Inadequate training.
Property owners who received complaints about crime but failed to respond face heightened liability.
Negligent security damages can be substantial include:
Initial emergency treatment, Surgery expenses, Inpatient care, Physical and other rehabilitation, Continuing care, mental health treatment (often substantial).
Lost wages and long-term wage impact.
Physical pain and suffering.
Mental health damages drive significant damages.
Loss of enjoyment.
Effects on intimate relationships.
In fatal negligent security cases.
Negligent security cases frequently support punitive damages, especially where:
Owners are primary defendants.
Property management companies may share fault.
Security service providers may bear primary responsibility for security service failures.
Owners and operators can share liability.
Franchisor liability, brand owners may share fault.
The primary defense.
“How could we have known?”. Documentation of prior crime defeats this defense.
Defense argues the security provided was reasonable.
“Better security wouldn’t have prevented this”.
Plaintiff conduct defenses.
Sole-criminal-responsibility arguments. This defense generally fails.
Don’t accept informal handling. Crime reports are critical.
Same-day medical care matters significantly.
The location, lighting, cameras, security personnel, access controls, and overall security.
What was inadequate.
Visual evidence of every relevant detail.
Independent observers.
Prior crime evidence should be gathered.
PTSD and other psychological consequences often require significant treatment.
Property owner insurers contact quickly. Direct insurer communication hurt the claim.
Negligent security attorneys earn fees only on recovery. Specialty expertise costs reimbursed from the recovery.
Evidence has preservation windows.
Video recordings requires prompt preservation.
Employee turnover making them harder to locate.
Property owners may modify security, which can be used as evidence of inadequacy.
Filing deadlines sets a hard cutoff.
Engaging counsel right away locks down the critical evidence.
When a shooting happens in a parking lot, hotel hallway, apartment complex, or store, the criminal is rarely the only one responsible. Property owners have a legal duty to put in place reasonable security for everyone they invite onto their premises — and when they neglect that duty, foreseeable crimes happen and innocent people get hurt. Negligent security claims come about when a property had a track record of prior crimes that should have prompted action, when known hazards like broken locks, dead security cameras, burned-out parking lot lights, missing security personnel, and unsecured access points were never fixed, and when reasonable measures — proper lighting, working surveillance, trained guards, access controls — would have deterred the attack. At McKay Law, we tackle these cases by investigating the property’s crime history, prior complaints to management, security audits, police call records, and the owner’s response — or non-response — to known risks. We retain security experts, crime prevention specialists, and former law enforcement to confirm exactly what a reasonable owner would have done and why this owner failed.
Apartment complexes, hotels, parking garages, shopping centers, bars and nightclubs, ATMs, gas stations, college campuses, and event venues all carry substantial legal responsibility for the safety of the people they invite onto their property. When you come into the McKay Law family, we demand compensation that reflects the full scope of what was taken from you — physical and emotional. We fight for complete compensation for emergency care, surgeries, hospitalization, ongoing rehabilitation, future medical needs, prescription costs, counseling and psychiatric care for trauma and PTSD, missed paychecks, loss of livelihood, the profound fear, anxiety, and emotional aftermath of being assaulted in a place that was supposed to be safe — and in the most devastating cases, the wrongful death of someone you cared deeply for. Reach us now at (866) 679-9651 or connect with us online to set up your free, confidential consultation and put a firm that regards crimes against innocent victims with the gravity they deserve in your corner.
See why so many others choose McKay Law, PLLC
With over 300 five-star reviews, McKay Law, your local Personal Injury Law Firm has earned the trust and gratitude of our clients. Every case we handle is unique, and every client’s story matters. Don’t just take our word for it—hear directly from our clients about their experiences and why they confidently recommend us to others.
